Author Topic: YIKES! My Maternal Great Grandfathers Were Brothers!  (Read 3681 times)

Offline CleGirl17

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 6
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
YIKES! My Maternal Great Grandfathers Were Brothers!
« on: Friday 31 May 19 06:05 BST (UK) »
I've just discovered that my mom's maternal grandfather AND her paternal grandfather were brothers! Wondering what relationship that makes them to me? Very confused but yet, this does answer some of the quirks in the family, lol! Thank you.
 

Offline pjm99

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 514
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: YIKES! My Maternal Great Grandfathers Were Brothers!
« Reply #1 on: Friday 31 May 19 06:34 BST (UK) »
They are still your Great Grandfathers. However, it does mean your mother and father were 1st cousins!
Allen, Brown, West - Berkshire
Caesar, Dicker, Lamden, West - Hampshire
Hicks, Martin, Masters - Kent, Middlesex
Hancox/Hancock/Hancocke - Warwickshire
Gardner - Devon
Traylen - Essex & Jersey

Offline majm

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 25,385
  • NSW 1806 Bowman Flag Ecce signum.
    • View Profile
Re: YIKES! My Maternal Great Grandfathers Were Brothers!
« Reply #2 on: Friday 31 May 19 06:44 BST (UK) »
You are still a great grandchild  they are still your mother's grandfathers.  There are no genetical issues for you to fret over,  and nor should your mother. 

JM

I've just discovered that my mom's maternal grandfather AND her paternal grandfather were brothers! Wondering what relationship that makes them to me? Very confused but yet, this does answer some of the quirks in the family, lol! Thank you.
 
The information in my posts is provided for academic and non-commercial research purposes. 
Random Acts of Kindness Given Freely are never Worthless for they are Priceless.
Qui scit et non docet.    Qui docet et non vivit.    Qui nescit et non interrogat.   
All Census Look Ups Are Crown Copyright from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
I do not have a face book or a twitter account.

Offline pharmaT

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,343
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: YIKES! My Maternal Great Grandfathers Were Brothers!
« Reply #3 on: Friday 31 May 19 08:23 BST (UK) »
They are still your great grandfathers but it means that they are also your Great Great uncles.  Although when I am related to someone in more than one way I take the closest relationship.


Pedigree collapse is very common in trees.
Campbell, Dunn, Dickson, Fell, Forest, Norie, Pratt, Somerville, Thompson, Tyler among others


Offline Gan Yam

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 583
  • Going Home - exploring my past
    • View Profile
Re: YIKES! My Maternal Great Grandfathers Were Brothers!
« Reply #4 on: Friday 31 May 19 15:35 BST (UK) »
They are still your Great Grandfathers. However, it does mean your mother and father were 1st cousins!

Does it not mean that the OP's maternal grandparents, her mothers parents, were the first cousins?
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline CleGirl17

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 6
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: YIKES! My Maternal Great Grandfathers Were Brothers!
« Reply #5 on: Friday 31 May 19 15:50 BST (UK) »
They are still your Great Grandfathers. However, it does mean your mother and father were 1st cousins!

I don't understand this response. Are you saying my biological mom and biological dad were 1st cousins? Or are you staing my mom and her dad were 1st cousins?

Thanks.

Offline CleGirl17

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 6
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: YIKES! My Maternal Great Grandfathers Were Brothers!
« Reply #6 on: Friday 31 May 19 15:51 BST (UK) »
They are still your Great Grandfathers. However, it does mean your mother and father were 1st cousins!

Does it not mean that the OP's maternal grandparents, her mothers parents, were the first cousins?

Maybe that is what this response was trying to say?

Offline Mike in Cumbria

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,755
    • View Profile
Re: YIKES! My Maternal Great Grandfathers Were Brothers!
« Reply #7 on: Friday 31 May 19 16:09 BST (UK) »
Clegirl's grandparents were first cousins, not her parents.

Either way, nothing to worry about.

Offline Maiden Stone

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 7,226
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: YIKES! My Maternal Great Grandfathers Were Brothers!
« Reply #8 on: Friday 31 May 19 16:12 BST (UK) »
They are still your Great Grandfathers. However, it does mean your mother and father were 1st cousins!

Does it not mean that the OP's maternal grandparents, her mothers parents, were the first cousins?
I agree with Gan Yam. CleGirl's maternal great grandfathers were brothers; her maternal grandparents were 1st cousins. Her father, I assume was not related by blood to her mother.
Cowban