Author Topic: 1939 Register conundrum  (Read 3105 times)

Offline Westy11

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,770
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: 1939 Register conundrum
« Reply #9 on: Friday 31 May 19 08:19 BST (UK) »
It looks good. 

I still dont understand the male names thing and maybe this is one of those QI "Nobody knows"?

Offline mckha489

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 9,400
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: 1939 Register conundrum
« Reply #10 on: Friday 31 May 19 08:56 BST (UK) »
Edward Scholfield May have been an alias for Charles Parkin.  Reverted back to Parkin when he wanted to claim a pension?

Online Millmoor

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,460
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: 1939 Register conundrum
« Reply #11 on: Friday 31 May 19 09:30 BST (UK) »
Perhaps one of the names was an alias. Re the birth that Rosie found for Charles Friend Parkin it seems a bit of a coincidence that his mmn was ... Schofield.

There is a very detailed tree on Ancestry for Charles Friend Parkin  which is well worth a look. He would appear to have married Mary Emma Wilford in 1919. Was he simply living with Margaret in 1939? (his wife is easy to find in 1939 - she married again in 1948).

William
Dent (Haltwhistle and Sacriston), Bell and Jetson (Haltwhistle), Postle, Ward, Longstaff, Purvis, Manners, Parnaby and Hardy (Co. Durham), Kennedy and McRobert (Banffshire), Reid(Bathgate), Watson (Wemyss), Graham (Libberton), Sandilands (Carmichael), Munro (Dingwall)

Online rosie99

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 41,948
  • ALFIE 2009 - 2021 (Rosbercon Sky's the Limit)
    • View Profile
Re: 1939 Register conundrum
« Reply #12 on: Friday 31 May 19 09:44 BST (UK) »
The reference to Charles Friend Parkin's police record in 1922 - Apparently he stole 10 bicycles in Doncaster, 9 in Wakefield, 3 in Retford and odd ones at Selby, Denaby, Edlington, Thorne & other places - 31 in all.  I think he was definitely using an alias in 1939 hence the different names
Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk


Offline Westy11

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,770
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: 1939 Register conundrum
« Reply #13 on: Friday 31 May 19 09:46 BST (UK) »
Its fascinates me that some person involved with the 1939 register has worked this all out or seems to have worked this out hence the modifications.

Online rosie99

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 41,948
  • ALFIE 2009 - 2021 (Rosbercon Sky's the Limit)
    • View Profile
Re: 1939 Register conundrum
« Reply #14 on: Friday 31 May 19 09:49 BST (UK) »
As the NHS was using the register after WW2 it would probably have been amended then.
Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline Westy11

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,770
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: 1939 Register conundrum
« Reply #15 on: Friday 31 May 19 09:51 BST (UK) »
What is the NHS?

Offline medpat

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,351
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: 1939 Register conundrum
« Reply #16 on: Friday 31 May 19 10:03 BST (UK) »
NHS is the National Health Service started in June 1948 and user of the 1939 register until the 1990s so correcting for marriages and deaths etc. where able. See link for more information

http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/help-with-your-research/research-guides/1939-register/
GEDmatch M157477

Offline Westy11

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,770
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: 1939 Register conundrum
« Reply #17 on: Friday 31 May 19 10:05 BST (UK) »
Thanks very much.

Westy