Author Topic: Widows remarrying in late 19th century  (Read 1136 times)

Offline Huwcyn

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 869
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Widows remarrying in late 19th century
« on: Sunday 06 October 19 17:37 BST (UK) »
My gggg-grandparents married at Llanbeblig (Caernarfon now) in 1789. Both were widowed. Would the name my gggg-grandmother have married under been her maiden name, or the surname of her first husband ? (Who is unknown to me)
Owen , Parry , Pritchard, Foulkes  o Llanddeiniolen
Jones, Bellis o Sir Fflint
Williams o Beaumaris
Chambers o Dulyn
Rowlands o Tywyn

Online BumbleB

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 14,307
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Widows remarrying in late 19th century
« Reply #1 on: Sunday 06 October 19 17:47 BST (UK) »
Surname of her first husband.

Transcriptions and NBI are merely finding aids.  They are NOT a substitute for original record entries.
Remember - "They'll be found when they want to be found" !!!
If you don't ask the question, you won't get an answer.
He/she who never made a mistake, never made anything.
Archbell - anywhere, any date
Kendall - WRY
Milner - WRY
Appleyard - WRY

Offline Gadget

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 57,138
    • View Profile
Re: Widows remarrying in late 19th century
« Reply #2 on: Sunday 06 October 19 18:02 BST (UK) »
Agree with BB - the surname of husband No. 1.

Gadget

Added - just a thought - unless they were still using the patronymic in that parish
Census &  BMD information Crown Copyright www.nationalarchives.gov.uk and GROS - www.scotlandspeople.gov.uk

***Restorers - Please do not use my restores without my permission. Thanks***

Offline philipsearching

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 4,092
  • I was a beautiful baby - what went wrong?
    • View Profile
Re: Widows remarrying in late 19th century
« Reply #3 on: Sunday 06 October 19 21:51 BST (UK) »
Just in case you are wondering how to proceed......

The second marriage shows the bride's name at the time (i.e. her married/widowed name) so the way forward is to match a previous marriage with a death.

For example - if she was Megan Jenkins you would need to find a marriage of Megan to Mr Jenkins, then find a matching death for Mr Jenkins.  The first marriage would give Megan's maiden name (unless she had been married more than once!)  So if Megan Powell married Robert Jenkins, then Robert Jenkins died, you might find a baptism for Megan Powell to take your line back further.

My apologies if this is stating the obvious - but it might be of use to other Rootschatters looking at this thread.

Philip
Please help me to help you by citing sources for information.

Census information is Crown Copyright http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk


Offline pinefamily

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,810
  • Big sister with baby brother
    • View Profile
Re: Widows remarrying in late 19th century
« Reply #4 on: Sunday 06 October 19 22:57 BST (UK) »
Were there any unusual middle names that may have been surnames? That is how I cracked a similar problem in my tree. A good friend pointed out to me a middle name of one of the children that turned out to be the maiden name of the mother. I've now gone back nearly 150 years.
I am Australian, from all the lands I come (my ancestors, at least!)

Pine/Pyne, Dowdeswell, Kempster, Sando/Sandoe/Sandow, Nancarrow, Hounslow, Youatt, Richardson, Jarmyn, Oxlade, Coad, Kelsey, Crampton, Lindner, Pittaway, and too many others to name.
Devon, Dorset, Gloucs, Cornwall, Warwickshire, Bucks, Oxfordshire, Wilts, Germany, Sweden, and of course London, to name a few.