Author Topic: Memorial Inscription Conundrum  (Read 1294 times)

Offline DonM

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,597
    • View Profile
Memorial Inscription Conundrum
« on: Thursday 13 February 20 14:39 GMT (UK) »
I have seen a lot of stones but this one has got me.
 
https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/154479490/agness-ralston#view-photo=131101083

Erected by John Ralston in the memory of his Father and Son who died 17 July 1804 its all a son can doo
Robert Ralston died 9 Oct 1853 aged 57 years (cir 1896)
Agnes Ferguson his wife died  20 Jan 1871 Aged 73 years (cir 1798)

The author (John) is a son of Robert and Agnes they married 1828 in Dalziel. So who the heck is referring to in the first line 1804.  Would it be his father's, father aka grandfather?

Don
I have turned off all email notifications, thank you.

Offline sonofthom

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 264
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Memorial Inscription Conundrum
« Reply #1 on: Thursday 13 February 20 14:52 GMT (UK) »
Very puzzling indeed! Could the John Ralston who erected the stone be an earlier John Ralston, probably the father of Robert Ralston? If so he has, rather oddly, not named his father and son and the lair has subsequently been used for other family members. I know it would be unusual but is there any inscription on the other side of the stone?
Sinclair: Lanarkshire & Antrim; McDougall: Bute; Ramsay: Invernesshire; Thomson & Robertson: Perthshire; Brown: Argyll; Scott: Ayrshire: Duff: Fife.

Offline Lodger

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,416
    • View Profile
Re: Memorial Inscription Conundrum
« Reply #2 on: Thursday 13 February 20 16:38 GMT (UK) »
I remember this stone from when I transcribed the MIs in this burial ground in 1982. My opinion then was that they had both died on the same day, looking at it again, I am still of the same opinion. There is no knowing what the circumstances were, the child may have been an infant or, like the two little Ralston brothers remembered on the next stone to this (on the same plot) it may have been a tragic accident, a drowning like the boys or a fire perhaps?

The last recorded interments in the plot with the stone shown in the photograph here were -
John Ralston aged 2 years, interred on 1st May 1903 at a depth of 5 feet.
Margaret Ralston aged 9 months, interred at a depth of 5 feet on 31st March 1915.
In the next plot, the final interment is -
Archibald Ralston aged 55 years, interred at a depth of 4 feet on 2nd December 1935.
A note has been added that the lairs are now full and the "Next interment to be in the bottom lair with the head the opposite way".
Both plots were originally owned by John Ralston and later transferred to Archibald Ralston.
Paterson, Torrance, Gilchrist - Hamilton Lanarkshire. 
McCallum - Oban, McKechnie - Ross of Mull Argyll.
Scrim - Perthshire. 
Liddell - Polmont,
Binnie - Muiravonside Stirlingshire.
Curran, McCafferty, Stevenson, McCue - Co Donegal
Gibbons, Weldon - Co Mayo.
Devlin - Co Tyrone.
Leonard - County Donegal & Glasgow.

Offline Josephine

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,218
  • Photo: Beardstown, Illinois
    • View Profile
Re: Memorial Inscription Conundrum
« Reply #3 on: Thursday 13 February 20 16:44 GMT (UK) »
The inscription says, "its all a Father all a Son can doo."

So the person erecting the stone was both father and son, which aligns with the earlier part of the inscription.

Regards,
Josephine
England: Barnett; Beaumont; Christy; George; Holland; Parker; Pope; Salisbury
Scotland: Currie; Curror; Dobson; Muir; Oliver; Pryde; Turnbull; Wilson
Ireland: Carson; Colbert; Coy; Craig; McGlinchey; Riley; Rooney; Trotter; Waters/Watters


Offline DonM

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,597
    • View Profile
Re: Memorial Inscription Conundrum
« Reply #4 on: Thursday 13 February 20 17:50 GMT (UK) »
John Ralston who erected the stone lists his parents are at the bottom.

Lodger are you thinking this is John's brother?  But John's parents never married until 21 Dec 1828.

Yes very sad about John's two sons John and David.  Five in total went through the ice that day on the Coursington Pond. A passing miner named John Murdoch managed to snag two but couldn't get the Ralston boys and young Robert Ross out in time.  Was nice of John to include young Ross on the memorial.  The complete story is in the 30 Jan 1875 edition of the Wishaw Advertiser. 

And, thanks for internments and SP says Archibald died 29 Nov 1925.

Josephine, the date 1804 date doesn't fit with his parents marriage or death unless its his father's brother or possibly grandfather. 

Don

I have turned off all email notifications, thank you.

Offline Forfarian

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 15,078
  • http://www.rootschat.com/links/01ruz/
    • View Profile
Re: Memorial Inscription Conundrum
« Reply #5 on: Thursday 13 February 20 18:14 GMT (UK) »
On the stone, there is a comma after the word Father, which suggests to me that it was only the son who died in 1804.
Never trust anything you find online (especially submitted trees and transcriptions on Ancestry, MyHeritage, FindMyPast and other commercial web sites) unless it's an image of an original document - and even then be wary because errors can and do occur.

Offline DonM

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,597
    • View Profile
Re: Memorial Inscription Conundrum
« Reply #6 on: Thursday 13 February 20 18:43 GMT (UK) »
Ah yes Forfarian but whose son.

Robert was b circa 1796 (nothing in the OPR's) so he is definitely not the son of Robert perhaps a brother of his father? 

Don
I have turned off all email notifications, thank you.

Offline Josephine

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,218
  • Photo: Beardstown, Illinois
    • View Profile
Re: Memorial Inscription Conundrum
« Reply #7 on: Thursday 13 February 20 20:23 GMT (UK) »
Wow, it's very confusing, indeed.

The lettering at the top is different from the lettering at the bottom. I would guess it was done circa the 1804 date but I'm not an expert in these matters.

If I were tasked with figuring this out, my guess would be that the John mentioned at the top can't have been the son of the couple at the bottom.

Please let us know if/when you figure it out.

Regards,
Josephine
England: Barnett; Beaumont; Christy; George; Holland; Parker; Pope; Salisbury
Scotland: Currie; Curror; Dobson; Muir; Oliver; Pryde; Turnbull; Wilson
Ireland: Carson; Colbert; Coy; Craig; McGlinchey; Riley; Rooney; Trotter; Waters/Watters

Offline DonM

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,597
    • View Profile
Re: Memorial Inscription Conundrum
« Reply #8 on: Thursday 13 February 20 20:45 GMT (UK) »
Yes but I'm afraid it will have to wait until we return to Scotland in May.  Perhaps the kirk minutes might help shed some light.

Don
I have turned off all email notifications, thank you.