Re:Thomas Young b1610 and Euphame Denholme b1615 - Innerwick

[DonM]

Thomas is under Yong marriage 1637 Innerwick

Its available through FS and SP
FS index has the Film number meaning you will see a microfilm version of the original only if you order it and prepay for its rental.  Then you wait a month or so until it arrives; drive, walk or whatever mode of transportation and you are awarded with a sore arm from searching page after page realizing you can't read this stuff.

SP version you get immediately but you still won't be able to read it. 

Both FS and SP make transcription errors.  But SP will credit you and make it right.  FS no, unless they send the wrong film then repeat as per the above.

No matter which way you go you still won't be able to read it but there is a Forum here that can help you through it and just like box candy or cereal this one has a prize inside. 

Birth's:
No Euphame on record but perhaps she baptised as something else.   
Yong over in Inveresk/Musselburgh 1613.

There is also a Thomas b 1640 in Innerwick father Thomas Yong could be yours maybe not.

Don

[billbir]

Thanks, you are certainly not the PR manager for FS!

[Forfarian]

Thanks, you are certainly not the PR manager for FS!

https://www.rootschat.com/forum/index.php?topic=714261.0

[billbir]

Forfarian,

I am totally convinced! You must be the PR manager for ScottishPeople

Bill

[Forfarian]

I am totally convinced! You must be the PR manager for ScottishPeople.

True, am I a great fan of SP.

However I am also quite a fan of FamilySearch, which is extremely useful as a finding aid, and when it has images of original documents - it has quite a lot of those now, and I have found a lot of information there over the years. For some types of search, it remains my first port of call. But one has to be aware of the limitations and pitfalls of FamilySearch, in spite of its usefulness.

[DonM]

She's on commission.

Don

[Forfarian]

She's on commission.

I wish ....