Author Topic: Holy Wedlock  (Read 623 times)

Offline Lady Di

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 4,424
    • View Profile
Holy Wedlock
« on: Tuesday 18 February 20 12:44 GMT (UK) »
Just an odd thing to find written in a Marriage record ...

Page after page of marriages are worded the same way ie XXX and YYY were married on date...
then
in the middle of all those is one marriage that reads: Edward Roote and Elenor Sturton were joyned in holy wedlock the 29 of Oct.

Anyone else seen one that was worded this way - and so different to all the others?

Not really important in the overall scheme of things really  :D
Just wondered why? 
Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Online Viktoria

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,962
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Holy Wedlock
« Reply #1 on: Tuesday 18 February 20 13:37 GMT (UK) »
Well in The present day Marriage service it uses the term “Holy Matrimony”
if any person present know any just cause why these two should not be joined together in Holy Matrimony——-.Holy Matrimony nowadays but Holy Wedlock in former times and still used but infrequently.
But as you say in the middle of lots of matrimonies up pops a wedlock.!
Records written in formal terms perhaps but in everyday speech other terms and one just slipped in perhaps.
Interesting.
Viktoria.

Offline emeltom

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,302
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Holy Wedlock
« Reply #2 on: Tuesday 18 February 20 14:11 GMT (UK) »
Perhaps, prior to the marriage, they were living together in Unholy Wedlock!

Emeltom
Smith Tiplady Boulton Branthwaite King Miller Woolfall Bretherton Archer and many more

Offline ThrelfallYorky

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,589
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Holy Wedlock
« Reply #3 on: Tuesday 18 February 20 14:23 GMT (UK) »
Emeltom - I like that idea!
Threlfall (Southport), Isherwood (lancs & Canada), Newbould + Topliss(Derby), Keating & Cummins (Ireland + lancs), Fisher, Strong& Casson (all Cumberland) & Downie & Bowie, Linlithgow area Scotland . Also interested in Leigh& Burrows,(Lancashire) Griffiths (Shropshire & lancs), Leaver (Lancs/Yorks) & Anderson(Cumberland and very elusive)


Offline mazi

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,117
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Holy Wedlock
« Reply #4 on: Tuesday 18 February 20 14:29 GMT (UK) »
It may be a way of indicating their religious preference, Elizabeth 1 was in favour of religious freedom
but only in private, all had to marry in the C of E.

There is a subtle difference between catholic and Protestant marriages.

She was about to change her mind in a few years time ;D ;D

Mike

Online Viktoria

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,962
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Holy Wedlock
« Reply #5 on: Tuesday 18 February 20 15:34 GMT (UK) »
Perhaps, prior to the marriage, they were living together in Unholy Wedlock!

Emeltom
There is still a lot of it about! ;)
Wedlock, Deadlock ,there must be a joke in there somewhere .
Mart may think of one.
Viktoria.


Offline Lady Di

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 4,424
    • View Profile
Re: Holy Wedlock
« Reply #6 on: Tuesday 18 February 20 23:10 GMT (UK) »
It may be a way of indicating their religious preference, Elizabeth 1 was in favour of religious freedom
but only in private, all had to marry in the C of E.

There is a subtle difference between catholic and Protestant marriages.

She was about to change her mind in a few years time ;D ;D

Mike

Interesting reason I hadn't considered
Might account for the lack of any other "holy wedlock" marriages - or maybe the parish clerk was just having one of those days and decided to wax lyrical for a change!
Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk