Arthur Isaacs and family late 1800s

[chempat]

In 1925 household :
John I Wilson   47  in country 23 years, from London.
Isabella I Wilson   50
Emma Shuman   56

[MillieBB]

If this is to fit Isabella appears to be a lot older than Arthur. 20 years ish. That appears to be quite a bit older than her brother if that’s who it is. 

[chempat]

1910 in New York census:
Jack Wilson   32  tailor  born England, father Rhode Island, mother born Germany, does not state immigration year
Isabelle Wilson   34 born Rhode Island, parents German,

Added:
1915
J I Wilson   38  tailor, 30 years in US.
Isabelle Wilson   40

[MillieBB]

Does this mean Isabella was 40 in 1915.  Arthur was about 19.  Could she have been Arthur’s mother not his sister ?

[chempat]

Emma Thuman/Shuman is described as sister-in-law so Isabella should be Isabella Shurman/Thurman.

Alternate view - he claimed he was visiting his sister, she was actually his sister-in-law, as John I Wilson was actually John I Isaacs, but then would have been asked why they had different surnames?

(Or the I stands for Isaacs)

Or this is the wrong family.

[MillieBB]

The reason I think it is the correct family is the fact that Louisa was staying with Carrie in Guildford having her child.  Also, the name Wilson is too much of a coincidence to ignore. We could never fathom why Louisa would choose Wilson for her and the family. She surely couldn’t have picked that name out of thin air. 

I think it fits I just don’t know how

What I can’t get my head round is the age gap between Arthur and Isabella/John. 

[mckha489]

Marriage

https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:24C7-KP9

Would Goodman = Gerald I wonder

[mckha489]

Census 1891

https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:31PX-7PZ

[MillieBB]

Ok reviewed this.  I agree that Goodman may have been Gerald but I still don’t understand where Arthur fits in.