Author Topic: faded ink on baptism entry 1701  (Read 407 times)

Offline maddys52

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 7,243
  • Census information is Crown Copyright http://www.
    • View Profile
faded ink on baptism entry 1701
« on: Wednesday 29 April 20 02:48 BST (UK) »
Hello,
Would anyone be able to please have a guess at what the faded writing is after "A son of John Strange and Katherine his wife was born December 12/13 - 1701 and was baptised, and was interred? December 28 1701 ..."

Any ideas for the last line on the page?

Thanks in advance.

I've added another view trying to make it a bit clearer.

Offline AMBLY

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 8,986
    • View Profile
Re: faded ink on baptism entry 1701
« Reply #1 on: Wednesday 29 April 20 03:19 BST (UK) »
Hi Maddy
(deleted)
ignore - realise you got this bit


cheers
AMBLY
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

"Now that we're all here, I'm not sure if we're all there...."

 Entre los individuos, como entre las naciones, el respeto al derecho ajeno es la paz
 Among individuals, as among nations, respect for the rights of others is peace
    ~Benito Juarez (1806-1872)

Offline horselydown86

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,437
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: faded ink on baptism entry 1701
« Reply #2 on: Wednesday 29 April 20 05:06 BST (UK) »
The second last line appears to be:

dyed unbaptized and was interrd, December 28 1701

The last line:

John totley* paid the Kings Tax


* I'm not sure of this name.

I'm also not sure whether or not this line relates to the Strange child.

Offline maddys52

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 7,243
  • Census information is Crown Copyright http://www.
    • View Profile
Re: faded ink on baptism entry 1701
« Reply #3 on: Wednesday 29 April 20 05:07 BST (UK) »
No worries.  :)

Actually, I think I may have worked it out: "the father paid the King's tax". Does this sound right?

Katherine "the wife of John Strange" was buried 16 Jan 1701 at Nettlebed. However, there is this entry for a child born December 1701 (though I think he was born and baptised December 1700 as that would make more sense).


Offline maddys52

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 7,243
  • Census information is Crown Copyright http://www.
    • View Profile
Re: faded ink on baptism entry 1701
« Reply #4 on: Wednesday 29 April 20 05:08 BST (UK) »
Oh, you answered at the same time horselydown.  :)

Yes, maybe "unbaptised" though I think it is "the father" paid the tax.

Offline horselydown86

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,437
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: faded ink on baptism entry 1701
« Reply #5 on: Wednesday 29 April 20 05:20 BST (UK) »
...I think it is "the father" paid the tax.

It could be.

Online arthurk

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 5,189
    • View Profile
Re: faded ink on baptism entry 1701
« Reply #6 on: Wednesday 29 April 20 14:11 BST (UK) »
Katherine "the wife of John Strange" was buried 16 Jan 1701 at Nettlebed. However, there is this entry for a child born December 1701 (though I think he was born and baptised December 1700 as that would make more sense).

Don't forget that until 1752 the new year started on 25 March, so December 1701 (as in the baptism extract) came before January 1701.

To avoid confusion, genealogists would normally refer to Katherine's burial date as 16 Jan 1701/02, which indicates 1701 Old Style and 1702 New Style (ie what we use now).
Researching among others:
Bartle, Bilton, Bingley, Campbell, Craven, Emmott, Harcourt, Hirst, Kellet(t), Kennedy,
Meaburn, Mennile/Meynell, Metcalf(e), Palliser, Robinson, Rutter, Shipley, Stow, Wilkinson

Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline maddys52

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 7,243
  • Census information is Crown Copyright http://www.
    • View Profile
Re: faded ink on baptism entry 1701
« Reply #7 on: Thursday 30 April 20 05:07 BST (UK) »
Oh, of course. Thanks Arthur, I must have been having a brain mush moment. (Especially as I've explained this change in dating to others before now!  ::) )

Online arthurk

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 5,189
    • View Profile
Re: faded ink on baptism entry 1701
« Reply #8 on: Thursday 30 April 20 15:20 BST (UK) »
I think most of us are having a few brain mush moments at present  ;)
Researching among others:
Bartle, Bilton, Bingley, Campbell, Craven, Emmott, Harcourt, Hirst, Kellet(t), Kennedy,
Meaburn, Mennile/Meynell, Metcalf(e), Palliser, Robinson, Rutter, Shipley, Stow, Wilkinson

Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk