In addition, with regard to DNA, if you are hoping to find connections with whom you share DNA from a few generations back, you will need to have a wider tree - ie you need to follow through the siblings of your ancestors, together with their children through to the modern day.
I write from experience - when I did my DNA, I expected to find familiar names within the trees of my DNA matches. And that has proved, even with those who have large trees, not to be the case.
In nearly every case I've had to do more broadening research to find where the links actually are.
But I also agree with Meelystar that there is great enjoyment to be had from following up the social history (street and area names, occupations, newspaper reports) associated with your ancestors.
I did quite a bit of research around cholera in the 1840's in London which affected some of my ancestors in South London. And typhoid also hit my family much later in Maidstone. Let alone TB whose prevalence led to my mother's frequent trips to the country from East London as a 'deserving' child to help her health with fresh country air.
Added - and if you're fed up with 'your lot' and need a rest, why not read through some of the threads here and join the investigators helping other people. That's good fun!!
Welcome to Rootschatters!