Author Topic: Ancestry removing matches less than 8cM  (Read 11478 times)

Offline LizzieL

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 7,946
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Ancestry removing matches less than 8cM
« Reply #63 on: Friday 24 July 20 17:22 BST (UK) »
OK if you tag them they will stay, but do you have time to check them all and add them to a group before August? I have thousands and have been working on them for several hours a day, but hardly made any inroads on them
Berks / Oxon: Eltham, Annetts, Wiltshire (surname not county), Hawkins, Pembroke, Partridge
Dorset / Hants: Derham, Stride, Purkiss, Sibley
Yorkshire: Pottage, Carr, Blackburn, Depledge
Sussex: Goodyer, Christopher, Trevatt
Lanark: Scott (soldier went to Jersey CI)
Jersey: Fowler, Huelin, Scott

Offline durhamgirl73

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 635
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Ancestry removing matches less than 8cM
« Reply #64 on: Friday 24 July 20 17:52 BST (UK) »
I look after three accounts and have already looked at every single distant person to see if we have a shared match - green dot added - with the changes coming all I have done is put a coloured dot next to those with a common ancestor or if I've added a note - am I going through all 6cm, 7cm and possibly 8cm again? - no way as I can't be bothered!

Could they not have deleted 6cm and 7cm for people who haven't been on ancestry for months and leave those who are on way too much keep theirs?

Offline youngtug

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 4,305
    • View Profile
Re: Ancestry removing matches less than 8cM
« Reply #65 on: Friday 24 July 20 18:02 BST (UK) »
If you just tag the ones with public linked trees there are not so many. And if you discount those with just 2 or 3 three people, for example, then there are a lot less.
.http://www.rootschat.com/links/05q2/   
  WILSON;-Wiltshire.
 SOUL;-Gloucestershire.
 SANSUM;-Berkshire-Wiltshire
 BASSON-BASTON;- Berkshire,- Oxfordshire.
 BRIDGES;- Wiltshire.
 DOWDESWELL;-Wiltshire,Gloucestershire
 JORDAN;- Berkshire.
 COX;- Berkshire.
 GOUDY;- Suffolk.
 CHATFIELD;-Sussex-- London
 MORGAN;-Blaenavon-Abersychan
 FISHER;- Berkshire.
 BLOMFIELD-BLOOMFIELD-BLUMFIELD;-Suffolk.
DOVE. Essex-London
YOUNG-Berkshire
ARDEN.
PINEGAR-COLLIER-HUGHES-JEFFERIES-HUNT-MOSS-FRY

Offline Gadget

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 57,137
    • View Profile
Re: Ancestry removing matches less than 8cM
« Reply #66 on: Friday 24 July 20 18:07 BST (UK) »
If you just tag the ones with public linked trees there are not so many. And if you discount those with just 2 or 3 three people, for example, then there are a lot less.

 :D

That's what I'm doing but adding some larger unlinked ones that look possible
Census &  BMD information Crown Copyright www.nationalarchives.gov.uk and GROS - www.scotlandspeople.gov.uk

***Restorers - Please do not use my restores without my permission. Thanks***


Offline durhamgirl73

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 635
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Ancestry removing matches less than 8cM
« Reply #67 on: Friday 24 July 20 18:08 BST (UK) »
Ok I will too  ;)

Offline luvtotravel

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 122
  • A Scot in Canada
    • View Profile
Re: Ancestry removing matches less than 8cM
« Reply #68 on: Friday 24 July 20 21:42 BST (UK) »
Just to confirm, I should tag 6-8 cM matches if they have surnames in their tree which may be relevant to my research.  I did message a couple of private very large tree holders just in case!  There are several trees of interest to me with no direct ancestor but they do have ancestors with the same surnames as mine same location but in the 1700's.  I should keep those?
BARRIE - Rutherglen     BENNETT - Wigtown, Glasgow
BURKE  - Lanarkshire, Ireland   CAMERON - Renfrew
CURLE - Dumfries    FRATER - Lesmahagow 
GENTLES - Sterling    GOLDIE - Paisley
GRAHAM - Roxburgh    HASTIE -Edinburgh
KERR  - Glencorse and Cambuslang
LOWRIE - Rutherglen and Ireland
McDONALD - Edinburgh and Cambuslang
MOYIES - Rutherglen    PICKEN - Kilmarnock
RAEBURN - Kilmarnock, Glasgow    SCOTT - Glasgow

Offline durhamgirl73

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 635
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Ancestry removing matches less than 8cM
« Reply #69 on: Saturday 25 July 20 14:37 BST (UK) »
youngtug - how many did you tag with public linked trees? I started doing this but deciding whether to continue.

Offline melba_schmelba

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,657
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Ancestry removing matches less than 8cM
« Reply #70 on: Saturday 25 July 20 18:17 BST (UK) »
Another idea of saving matches, you could use spousal names of ancestral siblings or cousins that you suspect had offspring but that you (or that match) haven't traced a connection to you yet, if you really are a glutton for punishment!

Offline youngtug

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 4,305
    • View Profile
Re: Ancestry removing matches less than 8cM
« Reply #71 on: Saturday 25 July 20 21:04 BST (UK) »
I am not counting
.http://www.rootschat.com/links/05q2/   
  WILSON;-Wiltshire.
 SOUL;-Gloucestershire.
 SANSUM;-Berkshire-Wiltshire
 BASSON-BASTON;- Berkshire,- Oxfordshire.
 BRIDGES;- Wiltshire.
 DOWDESWELL;-Wiltshire,Gloucestershire
 JORDAN;- Berkshire.
 COX;- Berkshire.
 GOUDY;- Suffolk.
 CHATFIELD;-Sussex-- London
 MORGAN;-Blaenavon-Abersychan
 FISHER;- Berkshire.
 BLOMFIELD-BLOOMFIELD-BLUMFIELD;-Suffolk.
DOVE. Essex-London
YOUNG-Berkshire
ARDEN.
PINEGAR-COLLIER-HUGHES-JEFFERIES-HUNT-MOSS-FRY