Author Topic: Ancestry removing matches less than 8cM  (Read 11514 times)

Offline brigidmac

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 6,007
  • Computer incompetent but stiil trying
    • View Profile
Re: Ancestry removing matches less than 8cM
« Reply #162 on: Friday 04 September 20 19:47 BST (UK) »
Im wondering if the small matches will still show up on thru lines

 if the trees line up

 I had a new 8cm 3c 3R last week
Roberts,Fellman.Macdermid smith jones,Bloch,Irvine,Hallis Stevenson

Offline durhamgirl73

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 635
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Ancestry removing matches less than 8cM
« Reply #163 on: Friday 04 September 20 23:42 BST (UK) »
I have just noticed that the decimal points have been removed from 8cM and 9cM.

Also:

Coming soon! We'll be updating AncestryDNA ethnicity results to be even more precise in the coming weeks.

adding new regions ... and Oceania

Offline Gadget

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 57,138
    • View Profile
Re: Ancestry removing matches less than 8cM
« Reply #164 on: Saturday 05 September 20 00:14 BST (UK) »
I have just noticed that the decimal points have been removed from 8cM and 9cM.


and in the 6s and 7s that we still have!
Census &  BMD information Crown Copyright www.nationalarchives.gov.uk and GROS - www.scotlandspeople.gov.uk

***Restorers - Please do not use my restores without my permission. Thanks***

Offline Flemming

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 913
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Ancestry removing matches less than 8cM
« Reply #165 on: Saturday 05 September 20 08:46 BST (UK) »
Did they tell anyone the decimals were going? Is that a rhetorical question?

Also just seen the ethnicity results are in a *new* improved (really?) format. Or perhaps they've just gone back to an old format.


Offline CelticMom

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 709
    • View Profile
Re: Ancestry removing matches less than 8cM
« Reply #166 on: Wednesday 09 September 20 18:23 BST (UK) »
I've just been looking at all the dna tests for family members I manage and each test has at least 10 confirm common ancestors below 8cm. It still makes absolutely not sense why Ancestry are removing them. Their reasons are not justified at all.

I've tagged all the ones below 8cm into groups for the tests that are important to me, but it's rather annoying that any new ones once they make the change will never appear.

Well done Ancestry - well done (Not!!)

Anderson & Marr - Midlothian & East Lothian
Bennett - Devonport
Catleugh & Shiells - East Lothian
Galvin, McLaren, Cullen & Dowling - Waterford, Ireland
Littlejohns - Plymouth & London
Mansfield - Benfleet & St Pancras
Michelin - London
Newlands - Midlothian & Fife
Paterson - Canongate, Midlothian
Rutherford and Johnston - Roxburghshire
Taylor - East Lothian & Berwickshire
Thomson - Leith & Muthill
Thorney, Hawkin, Lewis - Herefordshire
Small & Paulin - Northumberland
Varrall - Kent

Offline Flemming

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 913
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Ancestry removing matches less than 8cM
« Reply #167 on: Thursday 17 September 20 16:31 BST (UK) »
I agree. I'm really missing the lower matches. Whilst Ancestry crows about its *super* new ethnicity splits that appeal to the masses for a minute, the rest of us are left to plod on in total frustration with half a service.  :-[

Offline lisalisa

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 615
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Ancestry removing matches less than 8cM
« Reply #168 on: Saturday 26 September 20 15:53 BST (UK) »
Just noticed that 'the longest segment' is now missing, not sure when it disappeared.

Online LizzieL

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 7,968
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Ancestry removing matches less than 8cM
« Reply #169 on: Saturday 26 September 20 16:03 BST (UK) »
Just noticed that 'the longest segment' is now missing, not sure when it disappeared.

I'm sure it was there a couple of days ago. Well that didn't last long.
Berks / Oxon: Eltham, Annetts, Wiltshire (surname not county), Hawkins, Pembroke, Partridge
Dorset / Hants: Derham, Stride, Purkiss, Sibley
Yorkshire: Pottage, Carr, Blackburn, Depledge
Sussex: Goodyer, Christopher, Trevatt
Lanark: Scott (soldier went to Jersey CI)
Jersey: Fowler, Huelin, Scott

Offline melba_schmelba

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,658
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Ancestry removing matches less than 8cM
« Reply #170 on: Saturday 26 September 20 17:13 BST (UK) »
Just noticed that 'the longest segment' is now missing, not sure when it disappeared.

I'm sure it was there a couple of days ago. Well that didn't last long.
Presumably because it exposed how far Ancestry's Timber algorithm was diminishing matches, although I'm sure they'll say it was because it caused confusion ::).