« Reply #8 on: Wednesday 02 September 20 09:18 BST (UK) »
Tees, I agree with others that there is no need to take offence here. I have no doubt whatsoever that Milliepede was not casting aspersions by asking this question. Sometimes it is necessary to ask a range of questions to help get the clues to find answers. It is often helpful to tick off a checklist of basic questions to avoid falling into a trap of making assumptions - such as assuming any couple might be married without hard evidence (which in your case you have got).
I would also view Milliepede's question as a standard one. Since I have been doing family history for myself and on behalf of others I have now lost count of couples I have come across living with their family who appear married but were not. So I think this is a pertinent question to ask as it might have been something to consider if you had not already ticked that box off.
Also, I think I can safely say, in my experience of being on RC I have observed that Milliepede is one of the most helpful RootsChatters on here and very far from being a 'stirrer'.
I hope our posts might reassure you and make you feel more at ease about this Tees. I am sure that anyone who contributes on your thread wants to see you succeed in getting your answer and no offence is intended.
Conroy, Fitzpatrick, Watson, Miller, Davis/Davies, Brown, Senior, Dodds, Grieveson, Gamesby, Simpson, Rose, Gilboy, Malloy, Dalton, Young, Saint, Anderson, Allen, McKetterick, McCabe, Drummond, Parkinson, Armstrong, McCarroll, Innes, Marshall, Atkinson, Glendinning, Fenwick, Bonner