Martin household

[CaroleW]

You keep giving Rothwell NN2 and the address but fail to provide relevant info re her birthyear and marital status

Please read my reply above

[carol46]

I stated in my first post her surname was Martin. And I saw a marriage for a Eva bell to a Arthur Martin and thought her maiden name was Bell before I found out she was single never married.

[CaroleW]

But the 1939 entry you quoted in your opening post clearly showed her as single so how could a single Eva Martin previously be  Eva Bell 

[carol46]

I put nn14 not nn2 well I never knew if she was married or not. I presumed she might be married.

[CaroleW]

You appear to be missing the point I was making.   

You gave  a name and an address from the 1939 register (but no birthdate) which assumes you had actually looked at the original 1939 entry for Eva Martin

You say you "think her maiden name could be Bell" and mention a marriage you found (but no year of marriage) and ask if she had any children and ask for details of the house.

However - the 1939 entry you quoted clearly shows her as single so if you had actually looked at the original 1939 entry - why were you under the impression her maiden name could be Bell and she perhaps had children?

[carol46]

The 1939 register I saw never gave info that she was single. I never paid to view the full details.