His Native Place was Midgham. (from the convict record Neale has provided in his post).
From the Reading Mercury, Saturday 14 October, 1848
Berks Michaelmas Sessions.
The Michaelmas County Sessions commence on Monday next, at the Town Hall, Reading. The question of building the new Assize courts, we perceive, will again be brought under consideration. On Tuesday the trail of prisoners will begin, a list of whom we subjoin:-
(a long list including ….)
Richard Lewis, 25 for stealing a wether lamb, the property of Richard Dickens at Midgham.
From the Reading Mercury, Saturday 21 October 1848
Tuesday
The Court opened this morning at ten o’clock, before Robert Palmer Esq MP, Chairman and other magistrates.
……………..
RICHARD LEWIS, 25, charged with having, on the 17th of August, at Midgham, stolen a wether lamb, the property of Richard dickens. Mr Carrington appeared for the prosecution, Mr JJ Williams for the defence.
The evidence in support of the case was that the prosecutor, a farmer, had missed a lamb, between 2nd and 6th Aug. The prisoner was in his employ, but was not the shepherd. Sarah Allen his next door neighbour deposed that on Sunday morning the 6th between 5 and 6 oclock heard a noise and smelt something burning, and her broom was wet. Prisoner’s wife brought out a sack between 8 and 9 oclock which she hung on the wall. She also brought out a pail and poured out some bloody water. In the evening saw in the house a large meat pudding. Sarah Duck proved that she was staying prisoner’s father’s. On the Tuesday following prisoner’s wife came to dinner and some head was cooked and taken into the field to prisoner. Another witness reaping with prisoner, saw the dinner brought, it was part of a lamb’s head, and again on the Friday, part of a shoulder. He threw the blade bone away, and it was found among the withies.
The constable of Thatcham searched and found some bones in an ash-heap, and in the house found part of a leg of lamb. Prisoner said he had it of the butcher and afterwards of his father in law. Mr Stroud, buther, proved the bones & c., to have belonged to a lamb. Prison’s father in law deposed that he did not supply prisoner with the lamb.
Mr Williams contended that the evidence did not show that the lamb stolen was the property of Mr Dickens, or had ever belonged to him 0 that in fact the record had not been proved.
The Chairman summed up the evidence and the jury, after a short consultation returned a verdict of not ‘guilty’.
A previous conviction was then proved, and the Chairman sentenced the prisoner to ten years’ transportation.
JM