Author Topic: Unbelievable  (Read 3351 times)

Offline Greensleeves

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 4,495
    • View Profile
Re: Unbelievable
« Reply #54 on: Wednesday 30 December 20 16:32 GMT (UK) »
My daughter has come up with a solution to the problem of people from the London area (or plague rats as she calls them) coming illegally to this part of Wales and partying whilst we locals are locked down & her non-essential shop is closed as we stay at home to bring down the levels of infection:

She suggests the re-introduction of wolves into the Welsh mountains once more.  So feel free Pheno to come here under those conditions & exercise your English entitlement. Hope you can run fast.

Here in Wales by staying at home we've reduced the case rate from 650 per 100,000 to 450 per 100,000 in a fortnight.  I don't take kindly to people disobeying our laws - particularly those who don't live here.  For information the number of new cases in Sussex: 808. Number of new cases in Powys: 27.

Suffolk: Pearl(e),  Garnham, Southgate, Blo(o)mfield,Grimwood/Grimwade,Josselyn/Gosling
Durham/Yorkshire: Sedgwick/Sidgwick, Shadforth
Ireland: Davis
Norway: Torreson/Torsen/Torrison
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline LizzieL

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 7,958
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Unbelievable
« Reply #55 on: Wednesday 30 December 20 16:45 GMT (UK) »
Today's figures.
50,023 new case
981 deaths

Some of those deaths are catching up from unreported ones over Christmas

https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk/details/deaths

New year 2021 schedule
During the new year period, the COVID-19 Dashboard will be updated every day, but the amount of data being updated will vary. The following information is provided to assist forward planning only and is subject to change.

UK cases and deaths will be updated every day throughout the holiday period, with the following service changes:

England: data updated daily
Northern Ireland: no data on 1 January
Scotland: no deaths data on 1–4 January
Wales: no data on 1 January
UK totals for each day will reflect the sum of the nations which reported data. Cases and deaths that would have been reported during these periods are likely to instead be reported on the following days. As a result, any changes to published data should be interpreted with caution during this period, as they may be a result of changes to reporting schedules.

There was a similar statement for Christmas period but now disappeared
Berks / Oxon: Eltham, Annetts, Wiltshire (surname not county), Hawkins, Pembroke, Partridge
Dorset / Hants: Derham, Stride, Purkiss, Sibley
Yorkshire: Pottage, Carr, Blackburn, Depledge
Sussex: Goodyer, Christopher, Trevatt
Lanark: Scott (soldier went to Jersey CI)
Jersey: Fowler, Huelin, Scott

Offline Pheno

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,002
    • View Profile
Re: Unbelievable
« Reply #56 on: Wednesday 30 December 20 16:51 GMT (UK) »
  So feel free Pheno to come here under those conditions & exercise your English entitlement. Hope you can run fast.


Just more of your assumptions Greensleeves?  Can you quote me the words I used that suggested that I made a trek to the Brecon Beacons.  I have a chronic underlying health condition which will carry me off for sure if I get covid so i couldn't get out and walk anyway.

Its the expectation that everyone should do what the elderly population/government thinks is right to save them - the vulnerable - which I think is so totally wrong!  It seems to me that you all just want to save your own skins - just listen to yourselves.

Oh and if the government rules/regs/guidance is so good then no contradictions to opening Primary schools then on 4 January - they must know what they are doing.

Pheno
Austin/Austen - Sussex & London
Bond - Berkshire & London
Bishop - Sussex & Kent
Holland - Essex
Nevitt - Cheshire & Staffordshire
Wray - Yorkshire

Offline louisa maud

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 8,440
    • View Profile
Re: Unbelievable
« Reply #57 on: Wednesday 30 December 20 16:58 GMT (UK) »
I am bowing out of this subject, I feel it is getting out of hand

Louisa Maud
Census information is Crown Copyright,
from  www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Granath Sweden and London
Garner, Marylebone Paddington  Northolt Ilford
Garner, Devon
Garner New Zealand
Maddieson
Parkinson St Pancras,
Jenkins Marylebone Paddington
Mizon/Mison/Myson Paddington
Tindal Marylebone Paddington
Tocock, (name changed to Ellis) London
Southam Marylebone, Paddington
Bragg Lambeth 1800's
Edermaniger(Maniger) Essex Kent Canada (Toronto)
Coveney Kent Lambeth
Sondes kent and London


Offline Erato

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 6,750
  • Old Powder House, 1703
    • View Profile
Re: Unbelievable
« Reply #58 on: Wednesday 30 December 20 17:00 GMT (UK) »
"you all just want to save your own skins"

Oh, hogwash.
Wiltshire:  Banks, Taylor
Somerset:  Duddridge, Richards, Barnard, Pillinger
Gloucestershire:  Barnard, Marsh, Crossman
Bristol:  Banks, Duddridge, Barnard
Down:  Ennis, McGee
Wicklow:  Chapman, Pepper
Wigtownshire:  Logan, Conning
Wisconsin:  Ennis, Chapman, Logan, Ware
Maine:  Ware, Mitchell, Tarr, Davis

Offline Pheno

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,002
    • View Profile
Re: Unbelievable
« Reply #59 on: Wednesday 30 December 20 17:03 GMT (UK) »
Its how it comes across to me.

Pheno
Austin/Austen - Sussex & London
Bond - Berkshire & London
Bishop - Sussex & Kent
Holland - Essex
Nevitt - Cheshire & Staffordshire
Wray - Yorkshire

Offline Gone

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 499
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Unbelievable
« Reply #60 on: Wednesday 30 December 20 17:03 GMT (UK) »
  So feel free Pheno to come here under those conditions & exercise your English entitlement. Hope you can run fast.


Just more of your assumptions Greensleeves?  Can you quote me the words I used that suggested that I made a trek to the Brecon Beacons.  I have a chronic underlying health condition which will carry me off for sure if I get covid so i couldn't get out and walk anyway.

Its the expectation that everyone should do what the elderly population/government thinks is right to save them - the vulnerable - which I think is so totally wrong!  It seems to me that you all just want to save your own skins - just listen to yourselves.

Oh and if the government rules/regs/guidance is so good then no contradictions to opening Primary schools then on 4 January - they must know what they are doing.

Pheno
Oh my goodness! Don't bring the government into this, when did they ever know what's good for us?
I personally am practising self preservation, as would anyone. But I also have a conscience, if I was to pass on a deadly virus to someone, I'd be mortified.
So, once again, common sense is what motivates me.
And of course the vulnerable need to be protected, no matter what age.
But I must say, with age comes wisdom!

Moderator comment: Time for a break, folks.  Topic locked.