Author Topic: Frederick James Rowles Could this old family photo be repaired  (Read 327 times)

Offline McGroger

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,089
  • Convicts, Commoners and Outlaws
    • View Profile
Re: Frederick James Rowles Could this old family photo be repaired
« Reply #9 on: Friday 12 February 21 20:35 GMT (UK) »
markw78,
A few breaches of etiquette, here. Without asking, without acknowledging - allowing others to think it is all your work - you have run my restore through an artificial colourising app. I wake to find something I worked on all day yesterday... has been defaced. (Sorry, Stuart, I 'm colourblind so rarely colour myself but the auto colourisers don't really do a very good job.)
Peter
Convicts: COSIER (1791); LEADBEATER (1791); SINGLETON (& PARKINSON) (1792); STROUD (1793); BARNES (aka SYDNEY) (1800); DAVIS (1804); CLARK (1806); TYLER (1810); COWEN (1818); ADAMS[ON] (1821); SMITH (1827); WHYBURN (1827); HARBORNE (1828).
Commoners: DOUGAN (1844); FORD (1849); JOHNSTON (1850); BEATTIE (& LONG) (1856); BRICKLEY (1883).
Outlaws: MCGREGOR (1883) & ass. clans, Glasgow, Glenquaich, Glenalmond and Glengyle.

Offline Gadget

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 51,708
    • View Profile
Re: Frederick James Rowles Could this old family photo be repaired
« Reply #10 on: Friday 12 February 21 21:06 GMT (UK) »
I  agree with Peter. I have overlaid the colourised image on top of Peter's image and can provide the pds version. They are perfect matches. Note, also, that the only image on the thread that is the same dimensions as Peter's is the colourized one.

Gadget
Census &  BMD information Crown Copyright www.nationalarchives.gov.uk and GROS - www.scotlandspeople.gov.uk

***Restorers - Please do not use my restores without my permission. Thanks***

Offline TROOPER ROLLO

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 173
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Frederick James Rowles Could this old family photo be repaired
« Reply #11 on: Saturday 13 February 21 10:21 GMT (UK) »
Sorry Peter,
I had not realised it was your picture that was coloured.
I will discard it.


Offline McGroger

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,089
  • Convicts, Commoners and Outlaws
    • View Profile
Re: Frederick James Rowles Could this old family photo be repaired
« Reply #12 on: Saturday 13 February 21 10:35 GMT (UK) »
Stuart, you took it in good faith. I'm sorry your thread was sullied. :)
Peter
Convicts: COSIER (1791); LEADBEATER (1791); SINGLETON (& PARKINSON) (1792); STROUD (1793); BARNES (aka SYDNEY) (1800); DAVIS (1804); CLARK (1806); TYLER (1810); COWEN (1818); ADAMS[ON] (1821); SMITH (1827); WHYBURN (1827); HARBORNE (1828).
Commoners: DOUGAN (1844); FORD (1849); JOHNSTON (1850); BEATTIE (& LONG) (1856); BRICKLEY (1883).
Outlaws: MCGREGOR (1883) & ass. clans, Glasgow, Glenquaich, Glenalmond and Glengyle.

Offline markw78

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 101
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Frederick James Rowles Could this old family photo be repaired
« Reply #13 on: Sunday 14 February 21 12:59 GMT (UK) »
your very welcome TROOPER ROLLO rgds Mark w