Author Topic: Were baptisms always in a church/chapel?  (Read 925 times)

Offline MacGrigor

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,721
    • View Profile
Were baptisms always in a church/chapel?
« on: Saturday 20 February 21 20:03 GMT (UK) »
Hello,

I remember a member of RootsChat telling me a few years ago that in Scotland, marriages were not necessarily in the parish church, but could be done in a house, for example. I was wondering, would this apply to baptisms in Scotland too? I’d have thought with the font etc they’d have to be done in a church.

For England, I presume all marriages have to be done in a church, to sign the marriage register. I assume it’s the same for baptisms. Would it be for private baptisms too? If a child is particularly sickly, would they have to take them all the way to church?

Adam
Lipman family of Aldgate - ends with Lewis Lipman (d. 1871, Bethnal Green), son of John Lipman 'late of Glasgow' (1856)
McGregor family of Fodderty - ends with Alexander McGregor (b. 1765, Fodderty), son of Murdoch McGregor and Kate Stewart

Online dowdstree

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,745
  • Mary Malcolm - 1860 to 1945 - My Great Granny
    • View Profile
Re: Were baptisms always in a church/chapel?
« Reply #1 on: Saturday 20 February 21 20:11 GMT (UK) »
Hi Adam,

Can't speak for England but in Scotland Baptisms could be carried out in a house.

I was Baptised in my gran's front room on 6th December 1946. The weather was not good and I had a cold so the Church of Scotland minister came to the house. I was a 8 weeks old and we had travelled from Edinburgh to Dundee for the occasion.

Dorrie

Small, County Antrim & Dundee
Dickson, County Down & Dundee
Madden, County Westmeath
Patrick, Fife
Easson, Fife
Leslie, Fife
Paterson, Fife

Offline JenB

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 16,857
    • View Profile
Re: Were baptisms always in a church/chapel?
« Reply #2 on: Saturday 20 February 21 20:18 GMT (UK) »
My grandparents were Primitive Methodists living in County Durham.
In the late 1900’s and 1920’s all their children were baptised at home, which was apparently fairly common.
They had their own little font, which is now in my possession.
All Census Look Ups Are Crown Copyright from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline GR2

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 4,585
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Were baptisms always in a church/chapel?
« Reply #3 on: Saturday 20 February 21 20:43 GMT (UK) »
I was baptised in my grandparents' home with a sugar bowl as a font. It was always brought out for that purpose.

In general, if a child was baptised on a Sunday, there is a fair probability the baptism was in the kirk. On any other day of the week, it is more likely that it happened at home.


Offline Gan Yam

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 583
  • Going Home - exploring my past
    • View Profile
Re: Were baptisms always in a church/chapel?
« Reply #4 on: Saturday 20 February 21 20:44 GMT (UK) »


For England, I presume all marriages have to be done in a church, to sign the marriage register.

Adam

You could/can get married in Register Office since 1837 and now you can also get married in a place that is licenced for weddings (eg a hotel), this is fairly recent, but not sure exact date.
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline Jebber

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 5,376
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Were baptisms always in a church/chapel?
« Reply #5 on: Saturday 20 February 21 21:26 GMT (UK) »
Anyone could baptise a sickly child at home, it was often done by the midwife. If the child survived they would later be received into the church, which is the second part of the baptism.
CHOULES All ,  COKER Harwich Essex & Rochester Kent 
COLE Gt. Oakley, & Lt. Oakley, Essex.
DUNCAN Kent
EVERITT Colchester,  Dovercourt & Harwich Essex
GULLIVER/GULLOFER Fifehead Magdalen Dorset
HORSCROFT Kent.
KING Sturminster Newton, Dorset. MONK Odiham Ham.
SCOTT Wrabness, Essex
WILKINS Stour Provost, Dorset.
WICKHAM All in North Essex.
WICKHAM Medway Towns, Kent from 1880
WICKHAM, Ipswich, Suffolk.

Offline Kiltpin

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,115
  • Stand and be Counted
    • View Profile
Re: Were baptisms always in a church/chapel?
« Reply #6 on: Saturday 20 February 21 21:35 GMT (UK) »
The Church of England accepts as legitimate any baptism performed by any Christian, at any time and in any place.   

Regards 

Chas
Whannell - Eaton - Jackson
India - Scotland - Australia

Offline bodger

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,035
  • bodger sen. jun.
    • View Profile
Re: Were baptisms always in a church/chapel?
« Reply #7 on: Sunday 21 February 21 05:38 GMT (UK) »
Myself  and a neighbours daughter were baptised at an open air  prayer meeting by a preacher on horseback 1937/8 at Woodroyd nr Huddersfield
Attenborough, Bacon,Melbourne, Thorpe, Ride,Simpson/ Derbyshire, Judson,Bacon,/Keighley,
Lockett/ Manchester, Harling/ Lancaster & Manchester

Offline Retriever

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 509
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Were baptisms always in a church/chapel?
« Reply #8 on: Sunday 21 February 21 08:24 GMT (UK) »
My gtgrandmother was brought over from Ireland when six weeks old. Unfortunately that is all I know.

She married in an Anglican Church in London but I have been unable to find a single baptism for the resulting children.

This post has me wondering if they were all baptised at home, the last being mid 1880s.