« Reply #7 on: Monday 08 March 21 21:33 GMT (UK) »
Have you looked at the original of the 1797, or the FreeREG transcription of the marriage? Both of the parish, witnesses Edmund Brown and John Wade.
It does look very likely to the the right marriage.
Also I think horse and carts/carriages always had a good line as well in the 1790s, some people travelled by sea, but I am sure people did also travel across land even if it took longer, and stayed at coaching inns overnight on the way if the journey took more than 1 day.
Yes, I paid to download the image from Essex archives. As we know ‘of this parish’ can be a bit meaningless. Although having Edmund as a witness does point to Esther being local to Rochford. John Wade appears as a witness on four of the six marriages.
Yes, of the parish often meant they just lived there, or were temporarily living there at the time of marriage so as to wed in a certain church. I have ancestors from Rochford and that John Wade was a regular witness, I think he was the parish clerk or something.
I have an army ancestor who arrived back in the UK from America in 1784 and apparently when the ship docked, they marched from Portsmouth to Bury St Edmund's.
Researching:
LONDON, Coombs, Roberts, Auber, Helsdon, Fradine, Morin, Goodacre
DORSET Coombs, Munday
NORFOLK Helsdon, Riches, Harbord, Budery
KENT Roberts, Goodacre
SUSSEX Walder, Boniface, Dinnage, Standen, Lee, Botten, Wickham, Jupp
SUFFOLK Titshall, Frost, Fairweather, Mayhew, Archer, Eade, Scarfe
DURHAM Stewart, Musgrave, Wilson, Forster
SCOTLAND Stewart in Selkirk
USA Musgrave, Saix
ESSEX Cornwell, Stock, Quilter, Lawrence, Whale, Clift
OXON Edgington, Smith, Inkpen, Snell, Batten, Brain