Look at what you have written and I am sure you could instantly see the difference, but just in case:-
Do you have to be so patronising?
In everything you've quoted the documentation is carried to prove something. In the same way an ID card would be carried to prove who you are, or in the case of a Vaccine passport to prove that you'd had the vaccine. There could also be another one if you were unable to have it through medical reasons.
I shall ignore your patronising question Groom, as I value all human life.
Yes but the difference is have to prove medical history in such cases is a proven breach (case law) of Article 8(2) of the The Human Rights Act 1998 and therefore illegal. It also breaches Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights and Article 8 of the International Convention on Human Rights, so no matter what level you want to take it to it shows the UK in a bad light in the UK, Europe and the World the UK government can overrule UK law by statutory instrument, they can even just ignore European Law but they cannot escape the affect of the International Convention on Human Rights.
In addition having any of the current covid vaccines does not provide 100% assurance that the vaccinated person cannot become infected with covid, in fact it is accepted that a vaccinated person can catch covid but it seems such an infection is less severe to them.
There is currently no evidence that a vaccinated person cannot pass any asymptomatic covid infection to another person.
There is however evidence to show that many people who have had at least one covid vaccination are less likely to conform to the current covid safety rules.
The most dangerous thing in all is the government is likely to comply with the wave of request for a vaccine passport to allow people to travel and socialise more.
In actual fact the vaccine passport should be called the death passport because that is bound to be the result for a number of people the only question is -
What is the acceptable death toll?
Cheers
Guy
