Pages: 1 2 [3]

Author Topic: Eileen Sutton 1905  (Read 1857 times)

Offline magslote

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,175
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: 1911 census new rd impington
« Reply #18 on: Monday 19 April 21 10:25 BST (UK) »
carol8385, please can you do it on by behalf, thankyou very much.margaret.

Offline carol8353

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 17,588
  • Me,mum and dad and both gran's c 1955
    • View Profile
Re: 1911 census new rd impington
« Reply #19 on: Monday 19 April 21 10:45 BST (UK) »
Quote from: magslote on Monday 19 April 21 10:25 BST (UK)
carol8385, please can you do it on by behalf, thankyou very much.margaret.

Well I hope Cuffie is correct in his suspicion that you intended the reply to go onto Bob Tonks Thread.

I will message the moderators(Very simple to do,you click on Report to Moderators) on your behalf.

Carol 8353
Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline maddys52

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 7,213
  • Census information is Crown Copyright http://www.
    • View Profile
Re: Eileen Sutton 1905
« Reply #20 on: Monday 19 April 21 10:49 BST (UK) »
Quote from: bobtonks on Thursday 15 April 21 18:19 BST (UK)
it's possible she was adopted;  the 1911 record does state three children. AND ...  the name on the original does look like Lutton.
I found 1901 William & Mary A Lutton [both 1875] no children living Prestwich.

It does look like LUTTON, especially when compared to "S" in "Son" and "Single", however when comparing it to the "S" in "Stoker", I think the name is definitely SUTTON.
Pages: 1 2 [3]