Author Topic: James Kain born in Rochester Kent England 1858  (Read 223 times)

Offline BumbleB

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 12,095
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: James Kain born in Rochester Kent England 1858
« Reply #9 on: Sunday 02 May 21 17:14 BST (UK) »
Perhaps, as a last resort, you could purchase the marriage certificate.

Transcriptions and NBI are merely finding aids.  They are NOT a substitute for original record entries.
Remember - "They'll be found when they want to be found" !!!
If you don't ask the question, you won't get an answer.
He/she who never made a mistake, never made anything.
Archbell - anywhere, any date
Kendall - WRY
Milner - WRY
Appleyard - WRY

Online Maid of Kent

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 289
    • View Profile
Re: James Kain born in Rochester Kent England 1858
« Reply #10 on: Sunday 02 May 21 17:15 BST (UK) »
Im a stubborn little creature, why the heck should I go the easy way......... lol




Kidney,Kitney Detling Stockbury Chatham. Wenham Biddenden. Waltham.  Pemble Birchington/St Peters. Sibun Medway Chatham/Gravesend

Offline johnhood

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,900
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: James Kain born in Rochester Kent England 1858
« Reply #11 on: Sunday 02 May 21 17:18 BST (UK) »
Must ask who the 3 previous husbands were!

John
HOOD- STAFFORDSHIRE/LONDON/AUSTRALIA
WALKER-LONDON
HIGGS-LONDON
GOSLING-DEVON


Offline BumbleB

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 12,095
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: James Kain born in Rochester Kent England 1858
« Reply #12 on: Sunday 02 May 21 17:18 BST (UK) »
 :-X :-X
Transcriptions and NBI are merely finding aids.  They are NOT a substitute for original record entries.
Remember - "They'll be found when they want to be found" !!!
If you don't ask the question, you won't get an answer.
He/she who never made a mistake, never made anything.
Archbell - anywhere, any date
Kendall - WRY
Milner - WRY
Appleyard - WRY

Online Maid of Kent

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 289
    • View Profile
Re: James Kain born in Rochester Kent England 1858
« Reply #13 on: Sunday 02 May 21 17:34 BST (UK) »
first husband John Mulcare 1805 Limerrick Ireland  97th Foot reg. married Isabella Young 1840 Alderbury, Wiltshire, son John Gillingham Kent 1842, son George Wilts 1848,  son Edward  Wilts 1850-1850, John also died in 1850.
second husband James Frampton  dob unknown died 1856 married in 1852 Wiltshire father given as Peter Newland; James died in 1856 no children.
third husband Thomas Kain, 1805 -1886 married 1858, son James William born 1858
Kidney,Kitney Detling Stockbury Chatham. Wenham Biddenden. Waltham.  Pemble Birchington/St Peters. Sibun Medway Chatham/Gravesend

Offline BumbleB

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 12,095
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: James Kain born in Rochester Kent England 1858
« Reply #14 on: Sunday 02 May 21 17:52 BST (UK) »
Apologies for this - I've only looked at the records available via Ancestry:

1852 - marriage of James Frampton - full age, soldier to Isabella.

1856 - burial of James Frampton - aged 55

Transcriptions and NBI are merely finding aids.  They are NOT a substitute for original record entries.
Remember - "They'll be found when they want to be found" !!!
If you don't ask the question, you won't get an answer.
He/she who never made a mistake, never made anything.
Archbell - anywhere, any date
Kendall - WRY
Milner - WRY
Appleyard - WRY