Author Topic: Census remarks  (Read 1413 times)

Offline Jeuel

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,346
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Census remarks
« Reply #18 on: Tuesday 01 June 21 11:15 BST (UK) »
One poor relative of mine has "bastard" recorded in the occupation column!  Several decades later, the enumerator has kindly described a few-weeks-old baby as a "love child" - but the love child was not my great-great grandfather's, but his daughter's.  (She married the father later).

I also have various people called "feeble minded" or "weak-minded". 

Very un-PC by today's standards!
Chowns in Buckinghamshire
Broad, Eplett & Pope in St Ervan/St Columb Major, Cornwall
Browning & Moore in Cambridge, St Andrew the Less
Emms, Mealing & Purvey in Cotswolds, Gloucestershire
Barnes, Dunt, Gray, Massingham in Norfolk
Higho in London
Matthews & Nash in Whichford, Warwickshire
Smoothy, Willsher in Coggeshall & Chelmsford, Essex

Offline Maiden Stone

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 7,226
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Census remarks
« Reply #19 on: Tuesday 01 June 21 14:52 BST (UK) »
  Several decades later, the enumerator has kindly described a few-weeks-old baby as a "love child" -

A census enumerator was supposed to transcribe what the householder had written on the census return. "Love child" would have been the term used by the member of the household who completed the form.
One woman's relationship to the head of household on a late 19th century census return in England was "concubine".
Many women in an enumeration district in Manchester had their occupation recorded as "prostitute" on a census. It may have been 1861.

Added: As I don't wish to stigmatise Manchester I should point out that there were women in other towns and cities who had the same occupation. It's just that I found a concentration of them in 1 district, many in 1 street.
I've also seen "brothel keeper" as occupation for head of household, often in combination with "lodging-house keeper".
Cowban

Offline coombs

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 7,425
  • Research the dead....forget the living.
    • View Profile
Re: Census remarks
« Reply #20 on: Tuesday 01 June 21 15:25 BST (UK) »
Someone in Dennington, Suffolk was enumerated in 1851, but a remark on the census page was "died April 2nd". So the papers were collected a couple or so days after 31 March.

In 1871 though, my ancestors neighbours in St Pancras, London gave very vague info on the census, just initials for first names and "England" for birthplaces.
Researching:

LONDON, Coombs, Roberts, Auber, Helsdon, Fradine, Morin, Goodacre
DORSET Coombs, Munday
NORFOLK Helsdon, Riches, Harbord, Budery
KENT Roberts, Goodacre
SUSSEX Walder, Boniface, Dinnage, Standen, Lee, Botten, Wickham, Jupp
SUFFOLK Titshall, Frost, Fairweather, Mayhew, Archer, Eade, Scarfe
DURHAM Stewart, Musgrave, Wilson, Forster
SCOTLAND Stewart in Selkirk
USA Musgrave, Saix
ESSEX Cornwell, Stock, Quilter, Lawrence, Whale, Clift
OXON Edgington, Smith, Inkpen, Snell, Batten, Brain

Offline venelow

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 532
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Census remarks
« Reply #21 on: Tuesday 01 June 21 17:10 BST (UK) »
I looked at a village census where there were several families with wives described in the occupation column as "Concubine". 

I think the enumerator was expressing his views on people living "in sin" without benefit of clergy. I wish I could remember which village it was now.

Venelow
Canada


Online BumbleB

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 14,280
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Census remarks
« Reply #22 on: Tuesday 01 June 21 17:21 BST (UK) »
Perhaps we should all bear in mind that these remarks were written AT THAT TIME.  For us in the 21st century to pass judgement is perhaps wrong.  :-\ 

We can't change history - it was what it was - although I think there are those who would like to.  :-X
Transcriptions and NBI are merely finding aids.  They are NOT a substitute for original record entries.
Remember - "They'll be found when they want to be found" !!!
If you don't ask the question, you won't get an answer.
He/she who never made a mistake, never made anything.
Archbell - anywhere, any date
Kendall - WRY
Milner - WRY
Appleyard - WRY