Author Topic: Kelly Family Photo - estimate year and estimate age please.  (Read 406 times)

Offline Katharine75

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,178
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Kelly Family Photo - estimate year and estimate age please.
« on: Saturday 29 May 21 09:00 BST (UK) »
Hi all. I have a copy of a photograph from New England are of NSW. After thoughts on the year of photo. I was thinking 1870s? Also happy to hear estimates on age of sitter. I was thinking late 20s, early 30s perhaps.
It is a carte de visite. Perhaps someone is knowledgeable enough to advise if that might be a wedding ring on the finger as I know photographs were sometimes reversed in photography process.
Thanks, Katharine.

Online jim1

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 24,466
  • ain't life grand
    • View Profile
Re: Kelly Family Photo - estimate year and estimate age please.
« Reply #1 on: Sunday 30 May 21 14:35 BST (UK) »
1870's it is & mid-late decade.
It isn't reversed & I would suggest she is single.
My theory on fans is that it was considered a sign
of virtue & purity & I've often seen them in photos
of single women denoting their status.
I think early 20's so someone born mid-late 1850's I would suggest.
Quote
I know photographs were sometimes reversed in photography process.
Early photography ie. Daguerreotypes, Ambrotypes & Tintypes came out in reverse
because of the process used.
What you have is an albumin print produced from a negative so not in reverse.
Warks:Ashford;Cadby;Clarke;Clifford;Cooke Copage;Easthope;
Edmonds;Felton;Colledge;Lutwyche;Mander(s);May;Poole;Withers.
Staffs.Edmonds;Addison;Duffield;Webb;Fisher;Archer
Salop:Easthope,Eddowes,Hoorde,Oteley,Vernon,Talbot,De Neville.
Notts.Clarke;Redfearne;Treece.
Som.May;Perriman;Cox
India Kane;Felton;Cadby
London.Haysom.
Lancs.Gay.
Worcs.Coley;Mander;Sawyer.
Kings of Wessex & Scotland
Census information is Crown copyright,from
www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/

Offline Treetotal

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 28,450
    • View Profile
Re: Kelly Family Photo - estimate year and estimate age please.
« Reply #2 on: Sunday 30 May 21 16:12 BST (UK) »
I agree with Jim on date...Her age..late teens, early 20s.
Carol
CAPES Hull. KIRK  Leeds, Hull. JONES  Wales,  Lancashire. CARROLL Ireland, Lancashire, U.S.A. BROUGHTON Leicester, Goole, Hull BORRILL  Lincolnshire, Durham, Hull. GROOM  Wishbech, Hull. ANTHONY St. John's Nfld. BUCKNALL Lincolnshire, Hull. BUTT Harbour Grace, Newfoundland. PARSONS  Western Bay, Newfoundland. MONAGHAN  Ireland, U.S.A. PERRY Cheshire, Liverpool.
 
RESTORERS:PLEASE DO NOT USE MY RESTORES WITHOUT PRIOR PERMISSION - THANK YOU

Offline Gadget

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 57,137
    • View Profile
Re: Kelly Family Photo - estimate year and estimate age please.
« Reply #3 on: Sunday 30 May 21 16:15 BST (UK) »
Yep - and age guesstimate - l8-24. What a lovely calm face.
Census &  BMD information Crown Copyright www.nationalarchives.gov.uk and GROS - www.scotlandspeople.gov.uk

***Restorers - Please do not use my restores without my permission. Thanks***


Offline Neale1961

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 5,640
    • View Profile
Re: Kelly Family Photo - estimate year and estimate age please.
« Reply #4 on: Sunday 30 May 21 21:42 BST (UK) »
A very young face - I think late teens.
Milligan - Jardine – Glencross – Dinwoodie - Brown: (Dumfriesshire & Kirkcudbrightshire)
Clark – Faulds – Cuthbertson – Bryson – Wilson: (Ayrshire & Renfrewshire)
Neale – Cater – Kinder - Harrison: (Warwickshire & Queensland)
Roberts - Spry: (Cornwall, Middlesex & Queensland)
Munster: (Schleswig-Holstein & Queensland) and Plate: (Braunschweig, Neubruck & Queensland & New York)

Offline Katharine75

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,178
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Kelly Family Photo - estimate year and estimate age please.
« Reply #5 on: Monday 31 May 21 10:13 BST (UK) »
Thanks for replies. That confirms what I thought regarding age of photograph. I therefore think it is actually the daughter of whom the photo was supposedly of. I also know that the daughter remained unmarried, so that ties nicely with what was mentioned.
Regards, Katharine.

PS. family name is not KELLY but KING (I was asked for name but thought moderator was asking about one of my other posts from that day).