« Reply #11 on: Tuesday 15 June 21 13:13 BST (UK) »
Until people learned to read/write other people who could read/write wrote documents ( so the vicar, parish clerk, the banker, the legal officer, the tax man, all those people who had learned to read/write) including their names and wrote it down how is sounded to them... so depends on their accent, depends on how they heard it and phonically spelt it which is why you get several variants of the same name even the same person on different records...so back then, unlike now no one was precious about spellings of their name
If you look on marriage certificates you will see an X as 'their mark' so they didn't read/write, if you look at the census you will see 'can't read/write' and so the people didn't know what their name looked like written down, how it was spelt so couldn't even if they wanted to 'correct it' and many later on would just copy how they saw it was written by someone else...so maybe different to how their paent or sibling wrote their name
Spelling didn't become important until the mid 20th century and then because the education system put lots of effort into teaching reading and writing to all, and with all in compulsory education to achieve this.
So names or the spelling of names when researching are not so important, it is finding the primary 'connecting' record to prove parent to child or wife to husband
Leicestershire:Chamberlain, Dakin, Wilkinson, Moss, Cook, Welland, Dobson, Roper,Palfreman, Squires, Hames, Goddard, Topliss, Twells,Bacon.
Northamps:Sykes, Harris, Rice,Knowles.
Rutland:Clements, Dalby, Osbourne, Durance, Smith,Christian, Royce, Richardson,Oakham, Dewey,Newbold,Cox,Chamberlaine,Brow, Cooper, Bloodworth,Clarke
Durham/Yorks:Woodend, Watson,Parker, Dowser
Suffolk/Norfolk:Groom, Coleman, Kemp, Barnard, Alden,Blomfield,Smith,Howes,Knight,Kett,Fryston
Lincolnshire:Clements, Woodend