Author Topic: Witness for a wedding  (Read 279 times)

Offline Brie

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,113
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Witness for a wedding
« on: Sunday 06 March 22 08:10 GMT (UK) »
My apologies if this has been asked many times before. I have tried searching rootschat but too many threads come up!

What I would like to know is how old you had to be to be a witness to a wedding in the 19th century. Nowadays it looks as if over 18 is preferable but younger is allowed at the discretion of the celebrant, with the proviso that the young person understands their role. Was this the case in the 19th century?

Thank-you
Brie

Offline Girl Guide

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 6,330
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Witness for a wedding
« Reply #1 on: Sunday 06 March 22 09:29 GMT (UK) »
Quote below from a Rootschatter who replied to this type of query:-

In 1820 the relevant act was An Act for the better preventing of clandestine Marriages. (1753) Lord Hardwicke’s Act, which says  all Marriages shall be solemnized in the Presence of two or more credible Witnesses, without defining what a 'credible' witness was. It was up to who ever was officiating to decide whether they were credible or not. As long as the young person understood what they were witnessing, and could reach the register. In practice, probably about 11-12 was the youngest likely to have been asked. The advice to the clergy was these should, whenever practible be the relatives or friends of the parties, who would be able to testify afterwards to the identity of the persons from personal knowledge or recollection.
"Children should not be allowed to act as witnesses, but while the law permits girls of twelve years of age to contract matrimony, a clergyman would not consider it right to object to young persons as witnesses"
"The Marriage Law of England", James T. Hammick, published 1873.

The above was posted back in 2013 - Topic title was: Required age for marriage witnesses 19th century
Ashford: Somerset, London
England: Devon, London, New Zealand
Holdway: Wiltshire
Hooper: Bristol, Somerset
Knowling: Devon, London
Southcott: Devon, China
Strong: Wiltshire
Watson: Cambridgeshire
White: Bristol
Windo - Gloucestershire, Somerset, Wiltshire

Offline Davedrave

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,692
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Witness for a wedding
« Reply #2 on: Sunday 06 March 22 09:33 GMT (UK) »
An 1841 marriage record that I have (bride aged 21) was witnessed by a brother aged 18 and a sister aged 16 (those ages agreeing with subsequent censuses).
ESSEX: Cramphorn Raven Sams Sayers Taylor; GLOS: Beacham/Beauchamp; HERTS: Chamberlain Chuck; LEICS: Allot Bentley Godfrey Greasley Hunt Hurst Jarvis Lane Lea Light Woodward; LINCS: Lambert Mitchell Muse ; STAFFS: Hodgkins Jarvis; SURREY: Light; WARKS: Astley/Chesshire Bradbury Hicken/Hickin Hudson; WORCS: Ballinger Beauchamp Laight

Offline Brie

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,113
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Witness for a wedding - Completed
« Reply #3 on: Sunday 06 March 22 09:33 GMT (UK) »
Thank-you Girl Guide,

That answers my question beautifully.


Offline Brie

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,113
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Witness for a wedding
« Reply #4 on: Sunday 06 March 22 09:37 GMT (UK) »
Thankyou Dave,

I am trying to establish whether an aunt or a sister was a witness. And from the answers it is possible for a teenager......

Brie