Dreadful writing by Sellindge's vicar

[David Boulding]

From Sellindge, Kent 1667 (or 1664 if you see the rotten transcript) Richard Wick (or West) and Elizabeth Bolden (or Bolvin).

I can read:
Ricardus Wick et Elizabetha Bolden matrimonialis(sp?)/
 something something vidua something - 67

Why the writer makes this entry in Latin and the others in English I don't know. His dreadful writing is mostly the problem. Any suggestions for the 2nd line?

This is also

[arthurk]

It runs on from the first line and I think it reads (or at least means?):

.....matrimo
nio coniuncti sunt vicesimo octavo Aprilis

That is, they were married (literally 'joined in marriage') on 28 April. I think it's probably 67, but nearby entries and page headings might help you to deduce whether that is more likely than 64.

[David Boulding]

My word that was quick. Thanks ever so much. Wonderful service!

I was rather hoping there was going to be some exciting revelation but, alas, not today. Had I been able to decipher the writing I might have stood a chance

Why the writer did all the other entries in English but this one in Latin escapes me.