Author Topic: 1740's agricultural terms  (Read 2580 times)

Offline morris.merryweather

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 123
    • View Profile
1740's agricultural terms
« on: Saturday 10 December 22 14:44 GMT (UK) »
I've come across these terms on several farm bills from the 1740's. Any ideas?

For weight or measures, what was a 'strike' and a 'lead'? eg. 'a strike of beans', 'a strike of malt', and 'a lead of wheat' ?

And describing something as 'bold' or 'boold', and 'couerd' - perhaps boiled and cured? See attached - whatever it was, it happened to 'Chorey', 'Bendre', 'Boll' and 'Gref'... ???

Can't find anything on the web that might help. Thanks.

Offline Mike in Cumbria

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,776
    • View Profile
Re: 1740's agricultural terms
« Reply #1 on: Saturday 10 December 22 15:09 GMT (UK) »
I can't see "lead" on your clip but when I worked on farms in Yorkshire, "leading" was a term for transporting - "leading hay", "leading firewood" etc.  Would that make sense in your context?

Offline Mike in Cumbria

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,776
    • View Profile
Re: 1740's agricultural terms
« Reply #2 on: Saturday 10 December 22 15:13 GMT (UK) »
Can we see a bigger clip please?

Offline Mike in Cumbria

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,776
    • View Profile
Re: 1740's agricultural terms
« Reply #3 on: Saturday 10 December 22 15:23 GMT (UK) »
Strike.


In England and its colonies, 13ᵗʰ – 19ᵗʰ centuries, a measure of capacity used for grain, usually 2 bushels, about 70.5 liters, and equal to ¼ seam. It varied, however, from shire to shire, with values as low as ½ bushel and as high as 4. The word comes from the strike, a stick used to level the grain in a measure.

With the introduction of imperial measure in 1824, the strike became 2 imperial bushels (½ coomb, or ¼ quarter), about 72.74 liters.

Lederer reports the use of the strike in Connecticut in 1631.¹

Courtney reported that in west Cornwall, in the 19ᵗʰ century, a strike was “a Winchester bushel; the third of a Cornish one, which contained 24 gallons.”²

1. Richard M. Lederer, Jr.
Colonial American English. A Glossary.
Essex, Connecticut: A Verbatim Book, 1985.
Page 223.


Offline goldie61

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 4,833
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: 1740's agricultural terms
« Reply #4 on: Saturday 10 December 22 20:00 GMT (UK) »
What country are these documents from?
England, Scotland, USA?
It could make a difference as to their meanings.

As Mike says, a bigger clip would be helpful.
Lane, Burgess: Cheshire. Finney, Rogers, Gilman:Derbys
Cochran, Nicol, Paton, Bruce:Scotland. Bertolle:London
Bainbridge, Christman, Jeffs: Staffs

Offline mazi

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,139
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: 1740's agricultural terms
« Reply #5 on: Saturday 10 December 22 21:13 GMT (UK) »
Mid to late May is silage time, not maybe as we know it today but the principle goes back a long way.

Field names maybe and “balled”. Big bale silage :) or covered as in silage pit.

My SIL records his silage cuts each year.


Mike

Offline suey

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,843
  • The light is on but there's no-one at home!
    • View Profile
Re: 1740's agricultural terms
« Reply #6 on: Saturday 10 December 22 21:55 GMT (UK) »
What part of the country is this, could they be dialect words?

My thoughts for what it’s worth…
Chorey was ‘rooted’, meaning possibly that it was planted and showing as coming up.

‘Bold’ meaning that it was growing well.  I have heard this term used .
All census lookups are Crown Copyright from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
Sussex - Knapp. Nailard. Potten. Coleman. Pomfrey. Carter. Picknell
Greenwich/Woolwich. - Clowting. Davis. Kitts. Ferguson. Lowther. Carvalho. Pressman. Redknap. Argent.
Hertfordshire - Sturgeon. Bird. Rule. Claxton. Taylor. Braggins

Offline mazi

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,139
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: 1740's agricultural terms
« Reply #7 on: Saturday 10 December 22 22:09 GMT (UK) »
What part of the country is this, could they be dialect words?

My thoughts for what it’s worth…
Chorey was ‘rooted’, meaning possibly that it was planted and showing as coming up.

‘Bold’ meaning that it was growing well.  I have heard this term used .



I like that as well, suits the time of year also.
I do that with my peas.

Mike

Offline morris.merryweather

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 123
    • View Profile
Re: 1740's agricultural terms
« Reply #8 on: Sunday 11 December 22 06:20 GMT (UK) »
Strike.


In England and its colonies, 13ᵗʰ – 19ᵗʰ centuries, a measure of capacity used for grain, usually 2 bushels, about 70.5 liters...

Thanks!