Hi Wee Hugh,
Thank you for replying. I agree entirely but since it's there it was worth looking at just to see "IF" there was anything that made sense.
Fortunately for me it does . A lot of sense. Actually pretty accurate as to where past lines do come from. Such as: a couple of places that are very small ie Wales and Norway but those could well be accurate as they are on my mother's family as possibilities for distant relatives already.
My previous statement is not about the accuracy, it was about HOW the information is displayed for either parent. What I am seeing is not mentioned in their supplied information.
However I think I have an idea : I have the same ethnic places belonging to both parents yes!
Now where this occurs If I have parent 1 displayed the top line is a distinct color but on the Bottom line is the same color muted down. But where there is an ethnic place on just one parent side that is the only color displayed and on the correct top or bottom Line.
So the Painter tool it is able to show the Ethnicity for both parents at the same time with varied intensity of color as applicable. This is using only one ethnicity area at a time. That's pretty clever even if they are estimates.
I am calling the muted ones "shadows".
Have a good day everyone
Cheers from OZ , Essnell
Addit for Biggles50: I baulked at the Ancestry test for years. I only did it as my daughter did hers through them and I couldn't get any comparison with what I had for myself.
The result is that I didn't shift the brick in the wall but nudged another out of place elsewhere and totally unexpected.
However i was recently asked about geni.com by a friend. I had forgotten that I had a trial for there so I revisited that and used this new info from Ancestry ---- where did that go --- to a stack of family trees on MyHeritage, only one of which was shown on Ancestry. As expected they all disagree

So it pays to be connected to more places.
Essnell