Author Topic: Enquiry into Accounts at Probation Station - Pages 5-8  (Read 296 times)

Offline MasonT78

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 162
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Enquiry into Accounts at Probation Station - Pages 5-8
« on: Saturday 04 February 23 23:21 GMT (UK) »
Hi,

Can anyone help with the following? (Note - Black marks on images to cross out documents from page underneath). Apologies, this one is a bit difficult. so far I have:

Page 5
? of the superintendent
to the subject and state that they
been held ? that the ?
? one of ? but of ? other ?
? ? ? ? ?
? that ? ? day
? to the government

Page 6
the ? are helf
? to them and ? to ?
storekeeper ? ?
? works

(damaged) is ?
last ? ? ? a
being ? for the washing
of bedding and clothing. The
superintendent are ?
it was ? ?
and ? ? also had seen ?
any more ? ?
can be ?. I have ?
? and a ? the
attention

Page 7

The Comptroller general
request that the
superintended ? ?
? attend to the ? ?
which the ? of ?
and made at their respective stations
The ? and to be made
in accordance with the direct
? in ? 10 of the ? ?
and any ? which may
? is ? ? ? to
the ?
The Comptroller General
? they ? to removed
the superintendents that they
are

Page 8
? ? ? the ?
if ? ? and ? are
? hands, and that
as ? appropriate
of ? ? ? and ?
storekeeper ? and ? ? ?
the ? al all ?
his ? carried to ? ?
of ? ?







MASON
WYLIE
HAYES
DANDO
BINNS
SEARLE

Offline Wiggy

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 9,438
  • coloured by Gadget
    • View Profile
Re: Enquiry into Accounts at Probation Station - Pages 5-8
« Reply #1 on: Saturday 04 February 23 23:46 GMT (UK) »
  Thanks for setting out like this!  Much easier to find where you are.    ;)

 The authors writing isn't improving is it!!   ::) :-\  Will post then see if I can make out more sense - this doesn't make much as is.  :-\   
Can't do too much at a time.   

We need someone used to reading rotten writing!!!   ;D

Page5

attention of the Superintendent
to the subject and states that they
are held responsible that the ?opinions?
not only of the ?book - (or last) but of all other ?articles
and ?property/properly marks ? ?
implies? that may arise daily
to the Government?
Gaunt, Ransom, McNally, Stanfield, Kimberley. (Tasmania)
Brown, Johnstone, Eskdale, Brand  (Dumfriesshire,  Scotland)
Booth, Bruerton, Deakin, Wilkes, Kimberley
(Warwicks, Staffords)
Gaunt (Yorks)
Percy, Dunning, Hyne, Grigg, Farley (Devon, UK)
Duncan (Fife, Devon), Hugh, Blee (Cornwall)
Green, Mansfield, (Herts)
Cavenaugh, Ransom (Middlesex)
 

 Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.

Offline Wiggy

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 9,438
  • coloured by Gadget
    • View Profile
Re: Enquiry into Accounts at Probation Station - Pages 5-8
« Reply #2 on: Thursday 09 February 23 09:44 GMT (UK) »
Revisiting this 

Still page 5.
 second last line might read surplus rather than implies.   Makes more sense.
Gaunt, Ransom, McNally, Stanfield, Kimberley. (Tasmania)
Brown, Johnstone, Eskdale, Brand  (Dumfriesshire,  Scotland)
Booth, Bruerton, Deakin, Wilkes, Kimberley
(Warwicks, Staffords)
Gaunt (Yorks)
Percy, Dunning, Hyne, Grigg, Farley (Devon, UK)
Duncan (Fife, Devon), Hugh, Blee (Cornwall)
Green, Mansfield, (Herts)
Cavenaugh, Ransom (Middlesex)
 

 Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.

Offline MasonT78

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 162
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Enquiry into Accounts at Probation Station - Pages 5-8
« Reply #3 on: Saturday 11 February 23 00:54 GMT (UK) »
Thank you :)
MASON
WYLIE
HAYES
DANDO
BINNS
SEARLE