Author Topic: Parish record  (Read 545 times)

Online amondg

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 7,347
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Parish record
« Reply #9 on: Thursday 16 February 23 06:58 GMT (UK) »
Nottingham News  and Mercury 5 July 1850

At Mansfield on the 1st instant Mr. James Hurst in his 73rd year

ADDED
The Nottingham Review dated 5 July 1850 says he was of Bancroft lane

Online amondg

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 7,347
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Parish record
« Reply #10 on: Thursday 16 February 23 07:17 GMT (UK) »
Who is this one?

Nottinghamshire Guardian 27 January 1853

At Mansfield on the 21st instant Mr. James Hurst aged 83

Corrected

GRO index also has age 83 for James Hurst

Offline bbart

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,384
    • View Profile
Re: Parish record
« Reply #11 on: Thursday 16 February 23 07:21 GMT (UK) »

At Mansfield on the 21st instant Mr. James Mansfield aged 83

Mr Mansfield or Mr Hurst?

Offline bbart

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,384
    • View Profile
Re: Parish record
« Reply #12 on: Thursday 16 February 23 08:08 GMT (UK) »
Nottinghamshire Guardian 27 January 1853
At Mansfield on the 21st instant Mr. James Hurst aged 83

In case it may help in the future, the transcription for the above's burial record gives his address as "Whild Boar Lane".