Author Topic: 1871 Census - Meaning of Barrister's Son  (Read 1086 times)

Offline cozendon

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 8
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: 1871 Census - Meaning of Barrister's Son
« Reply #18 on: Saturday 18 February 23 07:55 GMT (UK) »
Hi KGarrad,

The will is ordered. Very exciting. Thankyou for clearing up the probate question.

Kind regards,

Steve

Offline bbart

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,384
    • View Profile
Re: 1871 Census - Meaning of Barrister's Son
« Reply #19 on: Saturday 18 February 23 09:26 GMT (UK) »
Oddly enough, his will went to probate again, in 1918, with probate to Ruth Sophia Esther Watts (his daughter and "only child").  The index does state there was a "former grant P.R. 13 November 1901"

I wonder if this means Leonard and Emma Ada didn't get the job fully done in 1901?

Offline mckha489

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 10,811
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: 1871 Census - Meaning of Barrister's Son
« Reply #20 on: Saturday 18 February 23 09:51 GMT (UK) »
The newspapers say it was done in 1901.

Ruth married in 1908. She had two sons
Henry Wager Dixon Watts & John Atkinson Watts
Henry was in the RAF. Won D.F.C. But killed WW2
John married a “dancer” as her 6th husband when he was 47 and rapidly divorced her.

Charles Wager’s brother Leonard Atkinson didn’t marry, and nor it would seem did any of the sisters.

So I don’t think there are any descendants of John Ryalls to find with a DNA test.

Offline cozendon

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 8
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: 1871 Census - Meaning of Barrister's Son
« Reply #21 on: Sunday 19 February 23 06:23 GMT (UK) »
Dear All,

I want to thank everyone who took the time to reply on my post. A relative began researching our family history four decades ago and though the 1871 Census told us that Charles Garnett was adopted, we had no knowledge of his biological parents. This forum has provided us with an answer.

Now, we certainly have Emily Garnett.

Likely, we also have the Ryalls family.

I will await Charles Ryalls' will. Probably, I will have more questions in future but I also hope to contribute to others' research. My genealogical experience is limited (beyond some simple searches on websites) but I do have many years' experience with early modern handwriting.

Visiting Henry Watts, who is not too far away, will also happen. Though every visit to a CWGC headstone is powerful, if we are the last remaining descendants of John Ryalls it will have extra significance whatever the context of the 1863 birth. Henry would have been my great grandad's half-cousin, who himself served in both world wars, a regular soldier from 1915-1947.

So, once again, thankyou. I will mark this as 'topic completed', for the moment.

Kind regards,

Steve