Author Topic: family trees  (Read 757 times)

Offline mudmonster

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 255
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
family trees
« on: Thursday 20 April 23 18:36 BST (UK) »
Hello again,just a quick question,while doing your family trees  do you actually branch  off (no pun intended) and do the brothers  & sisters  families as well  or do you just stick to parents and back
Thanks
Mud

Online Pheno

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,078
    • View Profile
Re: family trees
« Reply #1 on: Thursday 20 April 23 19:03 BST (UK) »
It depends entirely on what you want to get out of it.  Maybe you just want to know your direct ancestry.

However, if you want to connect with other researchers then you need to expand your tree to include siblings of all your ancestors - they will be your cousin's ancestors.

Pheno
Austin/Austen - Sussex & London
Bond - Berkshire & London
Bishop - Sussex & Kent
Holland - Essex
Nevitt - Cheshire & Staffordshire
Wray - Yorkshire

Online g eli

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 842
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: family trees
« Reply #2 on: Thursday 20 April 23 19:08 BST (UK) »
I started off by just going straight back, but I started adding siblings and their descendants when I was having difficulty with the main line. I have found tracing some of these lines very helpful as the main line person may be mentioned in births marriages and deaths and occasionally in censuses where the name has been badly transcribed or they have married.
Butler Derbyshire & Nottinghamshire
Targoose Lincolnshire : Targus the rest of England
Sollery:Staffordshire & Nottinghamshire
Saunders,  Phillips: Wiltshire
Oldknow: Derbyshire & Nottinghamshire
Hirons or Hiorns: Friswell: Whitmore: Warwickshire
Tanser: Leicestershire & Warwickshire
Kidger: Buxton: Cramp:Leicestershire
Goodall:Griffin: Ford:Minton:Derbyshire
Cormack:Dunn: Scotland
Taylor:Nottinghamshire
Fletcher Derbyshire, Nottinghamshire Staffordshire

Offline Zefiro

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 946
  • breeze from the west
    • View Profile
Re: family trees
« Reply #3 on: Thursday 20 April 23 20:04 BST (UK) »
I started off by just going straight back, but I started adding siblings and their descendants when I was having difficulty with the main line. I have found tracing some of these lines very helpful as the main line person may be mentioned in births marriages and deaths and occasionally in censuses where the name has been badly transcribed or they have married.

Truth.
Sometimes the only way to progress 'vertically' is to expand 'horizontally'.


Online Erato

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 6,903
  • Old Powder House, 1703
    • View Profile
Re: family trees
« Reply #4 on: Thursday 20 April 23 21:03 BST (UK) »
Unlike the RootsChat purists, I concentrate on going wide rather than deep.  I am looking for all descendants of the ancestors who immigrated to North America.
Wiltshire:  Banks, Taylor
Somerset:  Duddridge, Richards, Barnard, Pillinger
Gloucestershire:  Barnard, Marsh, Crossman
Bristol:  Banks, Duddridge, Barnard
Down:  Ennis, McGee
Wicklow:  Chapman, Pepper
Wigtownshire:  Logan, Conning
Wisconsin:  Ennis, Chapman, Logan, Ware
Maine:  Ware, Mitchell, Tarr, Davis

Offline Jackiemh

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 490
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: family trees
« Reply #5 on: Thursday 20 April 23 21:36 BST (UK) »
I have expanded my tree beyond my direct ancestors and found some very interesting things.
I think it gives you a better picture of how life was.
Jackie
Bateman, Baylis, Bellotti, Boag, Bower (Stillgebauer), Cattermole, Chester, Dullage, Felix, French, Fursse, Garrett, Gilbert, Harding, Haynes, Hazelwood, Plume, Putland, Rudge, Strickson, Vine, Warren, Whitehead, Whitehorn, Wiltshire, Youthed and many more

Offline mudmonster

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 255
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: family trees
« Reply #6 on: Thursday 20 April 23 23:57 BST (UK) »
Thanks to everybody on their thoughts ,I started with parents but  have spread out a bit going down all different lines
Mud

Offline clancam37

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 705
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: family trees
« Reply #7 on: Friday 21 April 23 02:01 BST (UK) »
Hi Mudmonster,
Looking at brothers/sidters can be rewarding particularly if they have an unusual christian name.  This unusual name may well be a family tradition going back in earlier generations.  Has been very helpful in many cases.
clancam37
Hello again,just a quick question,while doing your family trees  do you actually branch  off (no pun intended) and do the brothers  & sisters  families as well  or do you just stick to parents and back
Thanks
Mud

Offline ColinBignell

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 53
  • Image licenced from iStock
    • View Profile
Re: family trees
« Reply #8 on: Friday 21 April 23 09:01 BST (UK) »
My tree has over 6,800 people in it, of whom about 600 are direct ancestors. Exploring the side branches can be fascinating and is essential if you want to find your link to DNA matches. It can, however, also distract you from research on the main lines.
BIGNELL Oxon, Newport Pagnell Bucks, Highgate, Islington North London
MIDDLETON King's Lynn Norfolk
WILKINSON Islington North London
FARNBANK Berks, Middx
REYNOLDS Newport Pagnell Bucks
GOODING Middx
JEROME Berks
BARKER King's Lynn Norfolk