Following on.......
1901: 201 Dawlish Road, Selly Oak, Kings Norton, Worcestershire
Head: Charles King 39, Railway Clerk, b Enfield, Mdx
Elizabeth King 21, b Longton, Staffs
Arthur J King 14, Cycle factory Hand, b Ireland
Son: Frances G King 6, b Birmingham, Warwickshire
Dau: Florence E King 3 b Erdington, Warwickshire
Son: Charles A King, 1 mo, b Bournbrook, Worcestershire
Sister/Visitor: Eliza King, 45, widow, b Enfield Mdx
Boarder: Arthur Stonier, 14, Cycle Factory Hand, b Longton, Staffs
BIRTH 1888 - Walter Charles KING, mms O'SULLIVAN, Registered Edmonton, Dec Qtr 1888
BIRTH 1895 - Francis George KING, mms O.SULLIVAN, registered KINGS NORTON, Mar Qtr 1895
BIRTH: 1897 - Florence Elizabeth KING mms O'SULLIVAN, registered ASTON, Sep Qtr 1897
Think "Arthur J" aged 14 in 1901 -must be the same "William A" age 4 in 1891
( great find Debra! for birth, as William J )Here's the same family as 1901, in 1911
https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:X7B4-TC3Note: The son William King aged 24, born Cork, Machinist, Gun works
(echo fathers occupation in 1891)And here are BIRTHS of other children
1901: BIRTH : Harold Charles Augustus KING,mms STONIER, registered Jun Qtr Kings Norton
1903: BIRTH - Wallace Stuart KING, mms STONIER, registered Jun Qtr Kings Norton
1909: BIRTH - Cyril John KING, mms STONIER, registered Sep Qtr Kings Norton
1910: BIRTH: Kathleen Ellen KING, mms STONIER, registered Dec Qtr Kings Norton
Unable to find a marriage KING STONIER? Can anyone see it? (would be 'bigamous, if occurring whilst Bridget were still living, so possibly not one to be found). Ditto why no marriage of Bridget/Louise to JOHNSON?
So it appears, Bridget King , nee O'Sullivan parted ways with her husband Charles King between 1895 and 1901 - and took only her daughter Leonora with her - leaving (in unknown circumstances) her sons William & Francis (Walter may have died) and daughter Florence behind
Both she and Charles appear to have formed new relationships in the nature of marriage at around about the same time frame - this may somehow explain Bridget's alternative names, Louise , O'Brien? if she felt she needed to hide her past or unmarried status - especially if registering the JOHNSON children as legitimate when they were not?
Cheers
AMBLY