Hmmm - that
is strange ! If same girl - I wonder it that's something to do with the 2 marriages to TUCKER, like maybe the first one to TUCKER was 'declared not legal
Here's the last two census for Malvina
1871: 17 Dale Road, St PancrasRG10 / Piece: 242 / Folio: 80 / Page: 49
Head: Robert C TUCKER 25, Insurance Clerk, b Pimlico
Wife: Ida M TUCKER 24, b Guernsey
Mother-in-Law: Malvina I. S. HOSE 57, widow, Annuitant, b British North America
(a certain source has transcribed her surname as HORE, which is does look like, but could also be HOSE) 1881: 28 Carlton Street, St PancrasRG11 / Piece: 217 / Folio: 132 / Page: 71
Head: Mary Ann DURHAM 54, widow, b London
Son: Edgar DURHAM 24, unm, Clerk, b London
Son: John DURHAM 21, unm, Joiner, b London
Dau: Laura l DURHAM 20, unm, Dressmaker, b London
Boarder: William K (or R) LITTLEFIELD 20, unm, Smith, b Rotherhithe
Boarder: Malvenie HOSE 75, widow, Officers Widow, b N. K.
(Malvina's 'occupation' has been struck thru by the checker - obviously because it's not an occupation as such and doesn't fit into statistical analysis criteria. Definitely says "Officers Widow" - but a certain source has transcribed the 2nd word as "mistress' - what a let down to see it says 'widow')FreeBMD DEATH:Malvina Jane S HOSE age 78 - Pancras Sep Qtr 1882
Also, to note: In 1861, she was in the household of Henry EGAN, (not Peter).
Cheers
AMBLY