are you telling me its all wrong what i have
Yes, I think it's probably wrong.
The IGI on familysearch is just an index, and you can't just pluck out names that are right when the place is totally wrong without doing some research using parish registers.
My problem areas:
- I can't find a baptism for Johannes Peacock, so can't link him to Thomas and Mary who married in Riseley in 1793. Without this it's pure speculation. Have you checked the marriage entry in the parish register to see if a parish of residence other than Riseley is given, and to see who the witnesses were?
- if Mary Litchfield was 21 when she married then I doubt that her husband was one of the Thomas's baptised before 1750, although it's not impossible. Where do you get his birth being in 1747 from? Just an assumption? But he's much more likely to have been the one baptised in Riseley in 1747 than others baptised around the same time in other parts of the county.
- he can't have been the son of Thomas and Sarah from Lower Gravenhurst, if as you say, Sarah was buried in 1745. Lower Gravenhurst is only a couple of miles from Barton in the Clay, so it seems likely to have been the same couple. But Riseley is 20 miles from Lower Gravenhurst.
- it's a recipe for disaster to pick out a Sarah Whittamore baptised in Staffs and assume she was the one who married in Barton in the Clay, Beds. How about Sarah Whitamer baptised 1708 in Haynes, 6 or so miles away? But it's academic as I'm sure this isn't your line.
But first you have to establish who Johannes was. He may well have been the son of Thomas and Mary. In 1841 he was a blacksmith. In the 1803 Muster List for Riseley there's only one male Peacock listed - Thomas Peacock, blacksmith, married, age 42 with 4 children under 10, one of whom could have been Johannes. Which probably kills off any thoughts that Thomas was born before 1750.
So yes, your tree earlier than Thomas and Mary who married in 1793 is wrong.
David