Pages: 1 [2]

Author Topic: Thomas Gammage 1795  (Read 5373 times)

Offline seahall

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 13,772
  • https://5bravemen.weebly.com/
    • View Profile
Re: Thomas Gammage 1795
« Reply #9 on: Thursday 03 May 12 17:02 BST (UK) »
Hi again Dave.

Thank you for your kind words.  :)

If a woman was married it would be her married surname
and if not then her maiden name.

Sandy

Census Crown Copyright

Offline igammage

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 6
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Thomas Gammage 1795
« Reply #10 on: Wednesday 13 November 13 22:56 GMT (UK) »
Hello,

My cousin in Canada and I have been working on Thomas Gammage 1795. We have Elizabeth Whitsey as his wife.

At present we have a Thomas Gammage 1758 and Mary as the father and mother though we have some reservations about this. We feel that a generation may have been jumped and are presently exploring that as an option.

If you interested in this particular Gammage line please let me know and perhaps we may look at options togther.

Best wishes, Ian

Offline davebprice

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 7
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Thomas Gammage 1795
« Reply #11 on: Thursday 14 November 13 01:00 GMT (UK) »
Yes, I would like to work with you.  I have the marriage record of Thomas and Elizabeth but haven't had success yet trying to find his parents.  I have thought about looking at surrounding areas to see if a record exists beyond where he was married. 

Dave

Offline igammage

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 6
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Thomas Gammage 1795
« Reply #12 on: Thursday 14 November 13 01:09 GMT (UK) »
Hello Dave,

My email is

Email removed by Moderator, please use the PM System to exchange private information regarding living people

Cheers, Ian

Offline TicknerV

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 90
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Thomas Gammage 1795
« Reply #13 on: Wednesday 17 September 14 16:53 BST (UK) »
There were several GAMMAGE (or variants) families just to the west of Duston in Weedon Bec in the late 18th century, which might be worth your while exploring. If you find any links with the ones in Walgrave or Scaldwell get back to me, as I have more on them.

Offline igammage

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 6
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Thomas Gammage 1795
« Reply #14 on: Thursday 18 September 14 02:53 BST (UK) »
Greetings TicknerV,

I do have many in Weedon Bec and some in the other areas. I have sent you a private mail as I would like to share information.

Best wishes, Ian

Offline TicknerV

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 90
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Thomas Gammage 1795
« Reply #15 on: Thursday 18 September 14 07:45 BST (UK) »
A Henry GAMMAGE of Duston, yeoman, had his Will proved on October 4, 1768. A Thomas GAMMAGE "Gardener" was recorded in November 29, 1762 in the Militia List for Lamport. He was probably the Thomas GAMMAGE of Lamport who had a Will proved on November 11, 1769. A Thomas GAMAGE (c.1775-1850) and his wife, Mary GAMAGE (nee MORTON) (c.1776-1842) appear to have had issue in West Haddon. They were married in West Haddon on October 29, 1797. What were the names of any of the children of your Thomas, which might help to identify the correct family?
Pages: 1 [2]