theyh are 25 on 1841 census (they should have been 30).... everything else matches
Ages are unreliable in 1841. Census enumerators in 1841 were instructed to round down all adult ages (over 15) to the nearest 5 years. This didn’t always happen, but where it did, someone recorded as aged 25 could be anything up to 29, assuming their age was correctly reported in the first place.
only problem is why is she called Elizabeth and not Martha (as on the birth cert)
It might be unwise to assume Elizabeth and Martha are the same person. As was pointed out above, there are possible deaths for Elizabeth ABRAHAMS in the 1840s.
On the birth certificate for Mark Abrahams, her name is Martha Abrahams formerly Levy later Martin....
Martha’s names as given on Mark’s birth certificate imply her maiden name was LEVY and she was previously married to a MARTIN. There is a possible marriage for Martha LEVY to Abraham MARTIN in 1839. I think this is Martha and her family in 1841.
1841 censusHO107/717/ 8 folio 9 page 9
Love Court, WhitechapelAbraham Martin, 20, General Dealer, Y
Martha Martin, 25, Y
Hannah Martin, 9, Y
Abraham Martin, 7, Y
You will see they are in Love Court, as were the ABRAHAMS family in that census. There are possible deaths for Abraham MARTIN in the 1840s. Maybe Martha took up with Isaac ABRAHAMS after that?
In the 1851 in Hutchison Avenue, Abraham LEVY aged 17 could be the same person showing in the 1841 as Abraham MARTIN aged 7. Hannah PHILLIPS could be the same person showing in the 1841 as Hannah MARTIN (there is a
possible marriage in Mar Qtr 1851 in St Lukes, with Hannah LEVY and Samuel PHILLIPS on the same page). Given their ages, both Abraham and Hannah were probably Martha LEVY’s children from before her 1839 marriage to Abraham MARTIN.
Just a suggestion.