Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - AntonyMMM

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 ... 142
1
Family History Beginners Board / Re: Adoption 1921
« on: Sunday 21 April 24 22:02 BST (UK)  »
Not much to go on if there's no mother's name or address on the birth cert.

The document @Brendaedna has is a short certificate, issued sometime later - I've sent some advice on obtaining the full version ( which will have the mother's details) and then how to research further.

2
Family History Beginners Board / Re: Adoption 1921
« on: Sunday 21 April 24 18:38 BST (UK)  »
It’s my mums Birth Certificate says Marjorie Dennis Parker.  Her registered name is Marjorie Dorothy Parker….he adopted mums name (then hers) was Dennis. 

I keep trying to copy the Birth Certificate here, but it won’t let me.

What do mean by her registered name, if it is not what you have on the birth certificate - are you looking at two documents ?

I can see a Marjorie D ParkIN born in Bradford in 1921, bit not a ParkER.

I will send you a DM with my email - if you wish you can send me what you have and I'll try and explain it for you.

3
The Common Room / Re: Two Birth Records Six Years Apart - Same Person
« on: Sunday 21 April 24 16:40 BST (UK)  »
Thanks for your answers. I assume that the later one will have the original date of birth?

Yes.

And re-registrations are never connected to adoption.

4
The Common Room / Re: I can't find the GRO record for a dead'un
« on: Saturday 20 April 24 18:47 BST (UK)  »
First thing to do is to check other entries on the same page and see if they appear in the GRO index.

If they do, then look for a spelling variation/mistranscription

If not, it tells you that the page probably got missed  somehow in the digitisation / transcription process, and you won't find it.

5
The Common Room / Re: Criminal records
« on: Saturday 20 April 24 11:31 BST (UK)  »
First question is about Aliases : is there any convention about which name is given first

Recent convention is that whatever name the person first gets dealt with under becomes their "file name" and doesn't change.....any other name they later come to notice under is an alias.

6
Family History Beginners Board / Re: Adoption 1921
« on: Saturday 20 April 24 08:16 BST (UK)  »
I know my mother’s birth surname and her adopted surname and date she was born in 1921. Her birth certificate states her original surname and adopted surname … her first name and middle name remains as registered. From birth records her mother’s maiden name is the same as my mums.

What documents exactly are you looking at ?

Birth certificates should never have an adopted surname on them....to see one that does would be interesting.

But from what you describe I wonder whether you might be looking at index entries and could be  misinterpreting what you are seeing.

7
Family History Beginners Board / Re: No birth certificate that I can find
« on: Thursday 18 April 24 13:00 BST (UK)  »
There is a John JAQUES registered in Barnsley in 1895 ( indexed as JAGUES on GRO - mother's name WOOLHOUSE), have you discounted that one ?

8
England / Re: Explanation of BMD entry.
« on: Sunday 14 April 24 13:08 BST (UK)  »
Not sure whether this has been noticed on the "Entry Information" related to this particular 1929 query -

Possible late entry
Normally GRO Index page numbers are numeric, optionally followed by a letter. As this page number ('See D45') does not follow this format it is possible that it is a Late Entry. Late Entries mean that the registration of the event was delayed, e.g. parents did not attend the Register Office to record a birth but the birth was registered much later when the child was about to begin work, or an Inquest after a death prevented the immediate issuing of a death certificate. A Late Entry attempts to show a searcher where to look for the actual GRO reference. Unfortunately the format of such Late Entries is not standardised, but the usual pattern is a letter showing the Quarter of the Registration [March (M), June (J), September (S) or December (D)] followed by the last two digits of the year, thus giving the quarter and year when the Registration was entered into the GRO records. A reference that reads 'see J/75' would therefore indicate that the GRO registration and reference is probably to be found in the June Quarter of either 1875 or 1975 (depending on context).


Which shows what the issue is very well - absolutely no mention at all of re-registration, which is the explanation for the vast majority of such entries. True "late" entries do exist of course, but are actually quite rare, whereas the indexes, especially from 1927 onwards, are full of re-registrations.

9
England / Re: Explanation of BMD entry.
« on: Sunday 14 April 24 12:26 BST (UK)  »
As a FreeBMD transcriber - our instructions are to enter what we see.  We are not asked to interpret entries.

Which of course is correct, and as it should be, and I meant no criticism of the transcribers who have worked so hard to give us such a fantastic resource....the real issue is with the help/explanation that FreeBMD shows.

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 ... 142