Pages: 1 [2]

Author Topic: Edward hughes  (Read 3941 times)

Offline Gadget

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 57,138
    • View Profile
Re: Edward hughes
« Reply #9 on: Thursday 13 June 13 09:13 BST (UK) »
Not sure about that WR - Samuel would have been born circa 1834 according to the 1851 and they were married in 1828. 

Gadget
Census &  BMD information Crown Copyright www.nationalarchives.gov.uk and GROS - www.scotlandspeople.gov.uk

***Restorers - Please do not use my restores without my permission. Thanks***

Offline wrjones

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 8,481
    • View Profile
Re: Edward hughes
« Reply #10 on: Thursday 13 June 13 09:20 BST (UK) »
Whilst of course it is true about Samuel,her Tree on Ancestry looks at a much later marriage.

Regards
William Russell Jones.
Jones, Griffiths. Stephens, Parry, Gabriel, Conway, Hughes, Evans, Roberts, Lea, Hanmer. Peake, Edwards. Newnes, Davies. Thomas. "Blythin".
All North Wales.
Conway, Durber, Cartlidge, Lovatt, Bebington. Brindley, Sankey, Brunt. Dean. Clewes. Rhodes. Mountford,Walker,Bache, "Gibbons"Hood. Taylor
All Stoke-on-Trent.
Francis - Nantwich Cheshire.
Dennell - Cheshire/Staffordshire.
Talbot-Shropshire
Census Information Is Crown Copyright,from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline Gadget

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 57,138
    • View Profile
Re: Edward hughes
« Reply #11 on: Thursday 13 June 13 09:21 BST (UK) »
The tree looks a wee bit out - the marriage to a Mary Hughes was in St Asaph reg district

Don't trust Trees, WR  ;D
Census &  BMD information Crown Copyright www.nationalarchives.gov.uk and GROS - www.scotlandspeople.gov.uk

***Restorers - Please do not use my restores without my permission. Thanks***

Offline wrjones

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 8,481
    • View Profile
Re: Edward hughes
« Reply #12 on: Thursday 13 June 13 09:23 BST (UK) »
Yes I don't fancy the Samuel Hughes either as her first husband!

Regards
William Russell Jones.
Jones, Griffiths. Stephens, Parry, Gabriel, Conway, Hughes, Evans, Roberts, Lea, Hanmer. Peake, Edwards. Newnes, Davies. Thomas. "Blythin".
All North Wales.
Conway, Durber, Cartlidge, Lovatt, Bebington. Brindley, Sankey, Brunt. Dean. Clewes. Rhodes. Mountford,Walker,Bache, "Gibbons"Hood. Taylor
All Stoke-on-Trent.
Francis - Nantwich Cheshire.
Dennell - Cheshire/Staffordshire.
Talbot-Shropshire
Census Information Is Crown Copyright,from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline Gadget

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 57,138
    • View Profile
Re: Edward hughes
« Reply #13 on: Thursday 13 June 13 09:25 BST (UK) »
Just checked and that 1837 marriage was in Llanefydd. Both of the parish. She was 22 (b.c. 1815) and  he was 29 (b.c 1808). They got it wrong, me thinks.

Link:

https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.1.1/KC59-HP1

https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.1.1/KC59-H59

https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.1.1/KC5M-Y54
Census &  BMD information Crown Copyright www.nationalarchives.gov.uk and GROS - www.scotlandspeople.gov.uk

***Restorers - Please do not use my restores without my permission. Thanks***

Offline wrjones

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 8,481
    • View Profile
Re: Edward hughes
« Reply #14 on: Thursday 13 June 13 09:31 BST (UK) »
I think its right to point out when looking at some of these Trees on Ancestry,the danger of looking for info that might fit,as opposed to info that will fit!

Regards
William Russell Jones.
Jones, Griffiths. Stephens, Parry, Gabriel, Conway, Hughes, Evans, Roberts, Lea, Hanmer. Peake, Edwards. Newnes, Davies. Thomas. "Blythin".
All North Wales.
Conway, Durber, Cartlidge, Lovatt, Bebington. Brindley, Sankey, Brunt. Dean. Clewes. Rhodes. Mountford,Walker,Bache, "Gibbons"Hood. Taylor
All Stoke-on-Trent.
Francis - Nantwich Cheshire.
Dennell - Cheshire/Staffordshire.
Talbot-Shropshire
Census Information Is Crown Copyright,from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline Gadget

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 57,138
    • View Profile
Re: Edward hughes
« Reply #15 on: Thursday 13 June 13 09:34 BST (UK) »
Looking at that tree, they seem to have used the GRO indexes rather than parish records - they have Edward dying in Oct 1883, Wrexham - meaning the Oct-Dec quarter, Wrexham RD  - but he was buried 29 Nov in Brymbo according to the parish record.  This would mean that thye just looked for a marriage after SR began in 1837 and took the St Asaph one as the first one where a  Mary  married an Edward Hughes  ::) ::) ::)
Census &  BMD information Crown Copyright www.nationalarchives.gov.uk and GROS - www.scotlandspeople.gov.uk

***Restorers - Please do not use my restores without my permission. Thanks***

Offline Gadget

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 57,138
    • View Profile
Re: Edward hughes
« Reply #16 on: Thursday 13 June 13 09:38 BST (UK) »
If followed through, this baptism record for Samuel proves that Edward and Mary were his parents:

https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.1.1/KC5K-FYV

3 Nov 1833!

PS - WR,  you could contact the tree owner and point them to these records and their errors/assumptions made in the tree. What is worse, though, is that there are a number of other trees that seem to have copied the errors 'lock. stock and barrel'  ::)
Census &  BMD information Crown Copyright www.nationalarchives.gov.uk and GROS - www.scotlandspeople.gov.uk

***Restorers - Please do not use my restores without my permission. Thanks***

Offline Seer

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 23
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Edward hughes
« Reply #17 on: Thursday 13 June 13 14:03 BST (UK) »
Many thanks for all your work I think I would like to visit the grave yards  cause hughes is a very common name in Wales .  Thanks again


Pages: 1 [2]