Hi Catie
Can you imagine the pickle we'd get into genealogy-wise if women had babies at 70
. I'm in NZ so I understand the feeling re: exchange rate, but as Kenjo says, the ScotsPeople is possibly the best deal around - I don't know of a better way. My onlyadvice is that if you can use ScotsPeople, to plan out your searches so that you get best value for money (not like me first time a few yrs back, when it started up - I just went in all over the place and whoosh there went all my dollars!)
I made an error too, in my last post wondering if Margaret could be a CONNELLY as opposed to CONNOR - seeing as she was a CANNON, according to your earlier post & the marriage record on IGI - sorry about that! And I notice too, the 3rd Anthony on IGI born 1857 Glasgow (which is where Henry is supposed to have been born to the Census couple in abt 1854) - the name must have been very special to them !
That Henry in 1881, if the age at Census is right - and perhaps it isn't
given what we already have seen with 1871 records of the family - he could be born around 1854 or maybe if your very lucky 1855 - the magic year when birth certs detailed so much information on the family. Perhaps, in effort to see if the Census people are right, you could try find his birth first ?
Also perhaps, wondered if you have tried to locate them on Census 51, possibly in Glasgow?
Good luck - let us know how you go!
ANne