Author Topic: looking for burial of thomas kibble  (Read 4227 times)

Offline whdsn

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,037
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
looking for burial of thomas kibble
« on: Friday 16 January 15 22:54 GMT (UK) »
I'm looking for the burial of thomas kibble born 1771 churchdown married Joan welch in 1895 great witcombe and had 3 children in brockworth. i think Joan is buried in brockworth 1838

Offline groom

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 21,144
  • Me aged 3. Tidied up thanks to Wiggy.
    • View Profile
Re: looking for burial of thomas kibble
« Reply #1 on: Friday 16 January 15 23:08 GMT (UK) »
Here's Joan in case you dont have the full details:

Joan Kibble aged 67 buried 15th May 1838 at St George, Brockworth

There's a Thomas Kibble buried there 20th July 1849 but his age is given as 40, so too young - possibly a son?
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline whdsn

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,037
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: looking for burial of thomas kibble
« Reply #2 on: Friday 16 January 15 23:32 GMT (UK) »
Thanks for the information i do have Joan kibble burial.
Yes the thomas you mention could be his son, there was a thomas kibble baptized 1808 in brockworth and died in stroud 15Th July 1849.I wonder if this is the same person

Offline groom

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 21,144
  • Me aged 3. Tidied up thanks to Wiggy.
    • View Profile
Re: looking for burial of thomas kibble
« Reply #3 on: Friday 16 January 15 23:46 GMT (UK) »
I think it must be as that is the only death of a Thomas Kibble in 1849.
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk


Offline whdsn

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,037
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: looking for burial of thomas kibble
« Reply #4 on: Friday 06 February 15 17:46 GMT (UK) »
Hi just had joan's death certificate today and it shows occupation wife of parish clerk so do this mean thomas kibble was still alive in 1838

Offline groom

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 21,144
  • Me aged 3. Tidied up thanks to Wiggy.
    • View Profile
Re: looking for burial of thomas kibble
« Reply #5 on: Friday 06 February 15 17:53 GMT (UK) »
Sounds as if he could be, as usually it says widow of. However, it might be that it was recorded incorrecly and he had already died.

There are about 16 trees on Ancestry with this family, but none have his death, so it obviously isn't easy to find.
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline whdsn

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,037
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: looking for burial of thomas kibble
« Reply #6 on: Thursday 12 February 15 17:12 GMT (UK) »
Hi I found him on the 1851 census they have him down as thomas kittle. so he's still alive in 1851 and living in brockworth aged 80 yrs old

Offline Polly-1

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 11
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: looking for burial of thomas kibble
« Reply #7 on: Wednesday 18 February 15 14:29 GMT (UK) »
Thomas Kibble is recorded as a Parish Clerk, aged 80, in Brockworth on 1851 census, so looks to be same. Burial records don't seem to be recorded after 1851 in that area. Will keep looking.

Offline Annette7

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 8,009
    • View Profile
Re: looking for burial of thomas kibble
« Reply #8 on: Wednesday 18 February 15 14:50 GMT (UK) »
Think you'll find he died Dec.1853 Gloucester (registration district for Brockworth).

There seems to be anomalies with the recording of this - on FreeBMD regn. district just has a star (underlined) with ref. 6a 131, FindMyPast have district as Gloucester ref. 6a 151, and Ancestry have no district at all, ref. 6a 131.   However, if you look at the original GRO index you will see that for district it's written as 'Gla'ster' which has no doubt caused all the confusion!  I personally think that the page no. is 151 (as on FindMyPast).

Annette
Scopes (One-Name Study - Worldwide)
Suffolk - Grist, Knights, Bullenthorpe, Watcham
Scotland - Spence, Horne, Cowan, Moffat
London -  Monk

Don't walk behind me, I may not lead.   Don't walk in front of me, I may not follow.   Just walk beside me and be my friend.

Census Information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk