Pages: [1]

Author Topic: Is this transcription correct?  (Read 2066 times)

Offline SBib

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 321
  • Edwin Bibby b1848 British Champion Wrestler
    • View Profile
Is this transcription correct?
« on: Thursday 26 March 15 15:44 GMT (UK) »
Obtained from FreeCen, which appears to contain many errors;-

1861
Address: 1 Dye House Lane  Lancaster

BIBBY   Thomas       Head   M    M    35    Joiner     Yorkshire - Settle           
BIBBY   Margret       Wife   M    F    38            Westmorland - Milton           
BIBBY    Margret M           Dau    U    F    13    Scholar    Yorkshire - Settle           
RILEY   Mary A       Dau   U    F    11    Scholar    Lancashire - Lancaster           
RILEY   Hannah       Dau   -    F    7    Scholar    Lancashire - Lancaster           
RILEY   Alice               Dau   -    F    6    Scholar    Lancashire - Lancaster   

In 1871 they are shown as Thomas and Margaret Riley
BIBBY ONE-NAME STUDY

Offline BumbleB

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 14,307
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Is this transcription correct?
« Reply #1 on: Thursday 26 March 15 15:53 GMT (UK) »
The image is exactly as you have described.  The first three names are at the bottom of one page (17), the next three at the top of the following page (18).
Transcriptions and NBI are merely finding aids.  They are NOT a substitute for original record entries.
Remember - "They'll be found when they want to be found" !!!
If you don't ask the question, you won't get an answer.
He/she who never made a mistake, never made anything.
Archbell - anywhere, any date
Kendall - WRY
Milner - WRY
Appleyard - WRY

Offline Willow 4873

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,985
  • 22nd July 2013
    • View Profile
Re: Is this transcription correct?
« Reply #2 on: Thursday 26 March 15 16:13 GMT (UK) »
Maybe they used both names was Margarets maiden name Riley?

Willow x
Any census information included in this post is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk and is for academic and non-commercial research purposes only<br /><br />Researching: Hilton (Wolverhampton & Tamworth) , Simkiss & Mears (Wolverhampton & ?) Bowkett & Nash (Ledbury & Wolverhampton) Knight & Beard (Gloucestershire), Colley (Tibberton) Hoggins (Willenhall) Jones (Bilston), Harris & Bourne (Droitwich) Matthews (Wolverhampton & High Offley) Partridge (Monmouthshire)<br /><br /

Online heywood

  • RootsChat Honorary
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 40,866
    • View Profile
Re: Is this transcription correct?
« Reply #3 on: Thursday 26 March 15 16:16 GMT (UK) »
In 1871 they are Riley
4232/76/36
Census Information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Online heywood

  • RootsChat Honorary
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 40,866
    • View Profile
Re: Is this transcription correct?
« Reply #4 on: Thursday 26 March 15 16:20 GMT (UK) »
1851 also Riley - possibly different wife.

Maybe it was just an error. There is a James Bibby and family on same page.
Census Information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline SBib

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 321
  • Edwin Bibby b1848 British Champion Wrestler
    • View Profile
Re: Is this transcription correct?
« Reply #5 on: Thursday 26 March 15 16:29 GMT (UK) »
Thanks all. I think it must be an error. I can't find any of them as Bibbys.
BIBBY ONE-NAME STUDY
Pages: [1]