Author Topic: On-line record does not exist in real life?  (Read 1737 times)

Offline mazi

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,117
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: On-line record does not exist in real life?
« Reply #9 on: Wednesday 13 January 16 22:29 GMT (UK) »
This problem has cropped up before, the two parishes have been mixed, most Clifford records also appear in castle frome as well.

Mike

Offline Jebber

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 5,385
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: On-line record does not exist in real life?
« Reply #10 on: Wednesday 13 January 16 23:07 GMT (UK) »
Sometimes confusion can arise because of the way parish records were filmed by the LDS. When the filming of a parish was completed, there was sometimes unused film left, this was then used on an entirely different parish, at times the details from the second parish were accidentally recorded under the first parish on the film.

This was the explanation I was given at an LDS History centre along time ago,  I had queried why some events were apparently taking place miles from where the family lived.

Jebber
CHOULES All ,  COKER Harwich Essex & Rochester Kent 
COLE Gt. Oakley, & Lt. Oakley, Essex.
DUNCAN Kent
EVERITT Colchester,  Dovercourt & Harwich Essex
GULLIVER/GULLOFER Fifehead Magdalen Dorset
HORSCROFT Kent.
KING Sturminster Newton, Dorset. MONK Odiham Ham.
SCOTT Wrabness, Essex
WILKINS Stour Provost, Dorset.
WICKHAM All in North Essex.
WICKHAM Medway Towns, Kent from 1880
WICKHAM, Ipswich, Suffolk.

Offline Wyeriverviewer

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 14
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: On-line record does not exist in real life?
« Reply #11 on: Wednesday 13 January 16 23:18 GMT (UK) »
So, as I read it, the general consensus is that she was actually born in Clifford, but also recorded in Castle Frome by LDS, where ironically she was living 25 years later. Castle Frome is a very small place. Spooky or what?

Offline mazi

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,117
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: On-line record does not exist in real life?
« Reply #12 on: Wednesday 13 January 16 23:29 GMT (UK) »
So, as I read it, the general consensus is that she was actually born in Clifford, but also recorded in Castle Frome by LDS, where ironically she was living 25 years later. Castle Frome is a very small place. Spooky or what?

Were you looking at Herefords microfilm, if so I would be inclined to ask to see the original, just in case they have mixed records up when they filmed them.

My thought is that Clifford has far too many entries for such a small parish

Mike


Offline Wyeriverviewer

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 14
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: On-line record does not exist in real life?
« Reply #13 on: Wednesday 13 January 16 23:33 GMT (UK) »
Yes - I assumed the originals were still at the church?

Offline mazi

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,117
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: On-line record does not exist in real life?
« Reply #14 on: Wednesday 13 January 16 23:37 GMT (UK) »
I have noticed that quite a few entries which appear in both parishes have different spellings of surnames,  eg Baylis in castle frome and baylees in Clifford, suggesting there have been two transcriptions made from two different records, maybe missing pages have been filled in from bishops transcripts and allocated to the wrong parish.

There seems no logic to it, but I agree your baptism looks like it should be in castle frome.

Mike

Offline mazi

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,117
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: On-line record does not exist in real life?
« Reply #15 on: Wednesday 13 January 16 23:40 GMT (UK) »
Yes - I assumed the originals were still at the church?

Their online catalogue suggests they hold the original books, we had a organised visit some years ago, we could look an original book under supervision,but not touch.  Some are very fragile.

Mike

Offline Wyeriverviewer

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 14
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: On-line record does not exist in real life?
« Reply #16 on: Wednesday 13 January 16 23:43 GMT (UK) »
Thanks - just had a thought. I should check the Bishop's transcripts film for Castle Frome........

Offline majm

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 25,385
  • NSW 1806 Bowman Flag Ecce signum.
    • View Profile
Re: On-line record does not exist in real life?
« Reply #17 on: Wednesday 13 January 16 23:46 GMT (UK) »
You could contact familysearch and ask them the question  :)

https://familysearch.org/ask/help#sendMessage

Cheers,  JM
The information in my posts is provided for academic and non-commercial research purposes. 
Random Acts of Kindness Given Freely are never Worthless for they are Priceless.
Qui scit et non docet.    Qui docet et non vivit.    Qui nescit et non interrogat.   
All Census Look Ups Are Crown Copyright from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
I do not have a face book or a twitter account.