Webb/Peek/Maynard/Ingram

[amondg]

You may have missed a step somewhere.
St James Parish Records, Little Clacton
***James Webb married by banns Elizabeth Ingram 22 October 1836***
witness William Webb and Sarah Rayner.
Sarah Rayner signed all others made their mark.

Children of James and Elizabeth at Little Clacton
James bap 19 November 1836
John bap 16 June 1839
Ingram bap 6 October 1841
George bap 10 March 1844
Silas bap 31 August 1846

[amandaconnally]

wow, it certainly looks like i have and ingram as her maiden name would make sense to give one of their children that as a middle name. i note further on that ingram himself gives one of his sons, raymond, eliza's maiden name as a middle name, ie raymond peek webb.

looks like a family trait, thanks for the info, really appreciated!!
Amanda Connally-webb-ingram-rayner!!

[amondg]

1851 Census Little Clacton/Great Holland Road
James Webb 48 born GREAT CLACTON
Elizabeth 40 born KIRBY
James 13 born Little Clacton
John 10
Ingram 9
George 7

Parish Records St John The  Baptist  Great Clacton
James son of James and Susan Webb baptized 15 May 1803
this matches with DOB and place of birth 1851census.

Parish Records St Michael, Kirby le Soken
Elizabeth daughter of Robert and Susan Ingram baptized 27 October 1811.
this matches the 1851 census DOB and place of birth.

You have me confused Eliza' who married Ingram Webb her maiden name was Peek and she was a spinster when she married, daughter of George.

Added if you are using the family tree on anc---try it's incorrect as they have Eliza as daughter of Samuel and they have James Webb as the son of Richard Webb

 

[Mabel Bagshawe]

Possible from 1851? Living in  Bures St Mary, all born there

George Peak    28 - ag lab
Rebecca Peak    30
Mary Ann Peak    8
Eliza Peak    5

HO107, 1788, 255, 9

[Mabel Bagshawe]

Sorry Rosie - didn;t spot the link to this you posted earlier

[Mabel Bagshawe]

Think she's mistranscribed on Ancestry in 1861 as Eliza Peck, b c1844. Housemaid at Walton Hall, Walton le Soken

ref RG 9, 1093, 62, 5

[amandaconnally]

gosh it doesn't help that they misspellt their names, does it? peek/peak/peck. they also seemed to not be sure on their actual dates of birth!!