Author Topic: Darton Marriage 1654  (Read 563 times)

Offline saw119

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 308
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Darton Marriage 1654
« on: Wednesday 08 March 17 15:09 GMT (UK) »
Can anyone locate the marriage of Richard Wollen to Dyana Kell in Darton on Nov 23rd 1654. I have an entry for it in the Bradfield Parish Register, the grooms parish, but can anyone find it in the Darton records?
Woollen and the variations thereof (Woolin, Woollin, Woolen etc) in the West Riding area

Online BumbleB

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 14,307
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Darton Marriage 1654
« Reply #1 on: Wednesday 08 March 17 15:30 GMT (UK) »
Darton - 9 November 1654

Transcriptions and NBI are merely finding aids.  They are NOT a substitute for original record entries.
Remember - "They'll be found when they want to be found" !!!
If you don't ask the question, you won't get an answer.
He/she who never made a mistake, never made anything.
Archbell - anywhere, any date
Kendall - WRY
Milner - WRY
Appleyard - WRY

Offline saw119

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 308
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Darton Marriage 1654
« Reply #2 on: Wednesday 08 March 17 15:35 GMT (UK) »
Many thanks, interesting that it's recorded as the 23rd in Bradfield, perhaps when the Parish Register was told. Shame there's no more detail.
I found it quite unusual that the marriage was recorded in the Bradfield register at all, it's not a common feature.
Woollen and the variations thereof (Woolin, Woollin, Woolen etc) in the West Riding area

Online BumbleB

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 14,307
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Darton Marriage 1654
« Reply #3 on: Wednesday 08 March 17 15:49 GMT (UK) »
No idea - Bradfield doesn't appear in either the BTs for Yorkshire or the parish records for the West Riding.

Bradfield is part of the parish of Ecclesfield, whilst Darton is a parish in it's own right - Genuki



Transcriptions and NBI are merely finding aids.  They are NOT a substitute for original record entries.
Remember - "They'll be found when they want to be found" !!!
If you don't ask the question, you won't get an answer.
He/she who never made a mistake, never made anything.
Archbell - anywhere, any date
Kendall - WRY
Milner - WRY
Appleyard - WRY


Offline saw119

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 308
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Darton Marriage 1654
« Reply #4 on: Wednesday 08 March 17 15:57 GMT (UK) »
St Nicholas church Bradfield operated as a chapel of ease for St Mary Ecclesfield. It covered a huge area itself until it became its own parish in 1868. The register is quite frustrating and highly inconsistent.
Woollen and the variations thereof (Woolin, Woollin, Woolen etc) in the West Riding area

Online BumbleB

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 14,307
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Darton Marriage 1654
« Reply #5 on: Wednesday 08 March 17 16:12 GMT (UK) »
Out of interest, the next marriage entry at Darton was dated 23 November 1654  ;)

Joseph Oxely and Anne Webster

But that marriage doesn't appear in either Boyd's or the Family Search entries.
Transcriptions and NBI are merely finding aids.  They are NOT a substitute for original record entries.
Remember - "They'll be found when they want to be found" !!!
If you don't ask the question, you won't get an answer.
He/she who never made a mistake, never made anything.
Archbell - anywhere, any date
Kendall - WRY
Milner - WRY
Appleyard - WRY

Offline saw119

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 308
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Darton Marriage 1654
« Reply #6 on: Thursday 09 March 17 12:04 GMT (UK) »
You may be interested in the record in the Bradfield parish records. It seems they were married in Darton on 9th Nov and then banns were read in St Nicholas in November and early December. That seems a strange arrangement.
Woollen and the variations thereof (Woolin, Woollin, Woolen etc) in the West Riding area

Online BumbleB

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 14,307
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Darton Marriage 1654
« Reply #7 on: Thursday 09 March 17 12:46 GMT (UK) »
If you look at it very, very carefully you will see that the banns were read 22 OCTOBER, 29th and 5 NOVEMBER.  ;D  :-*
Transcriptions and NBI are merely finding aids.  They are NOT a substitute for original record entries.
Remember - "They'll be found when they want to be found" !!!
If you don't ask the question, you won't get an answer.
He/she who never made a mistake, never made anything.
Archbell - anywhere, any date
Kendall - WRY
Milner - WRY
Appleyard - WRY

Offline saw119

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 308
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Darton Marriage 1654
« Reply #8 on: Thursday 09 March 17 12:51 GMT (UK) »
If you look at it very, very carefully you will see that the banns were read 22 OCTOBER, 29th and 5 NOVEMBER.  ;D  :-*

Of course, I was reading it Nov and Dec for some reason. Good catch  :)
Woollen and the variations thereof (Woolin, Woollin, Woolen etc) in the West Riding area