Author Topic: Why was naturalisation needed in early 1914?  (Read 2118 times)

Offline Dinkydidy

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 402
  • When I WAS dinky.
    • View Profile
Re: Why was naturalisation needed in early 1914?
« Reply #9 on: Tuesday 23 May 17 12:40 BST (UK) »
Thanks for your comments and examples. It was not something I had encountered in the past, since all my forebears were of British origin.

Offline Aussie1947

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 4,326
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Why was naturalisation needed in early 1914?
« Reply #10 on: Tuesday 23 May 17 13:45 BST (UK) »

If you were not a British Subject or Naturalised one couldn't vote either.

Gerry

Offline Skoosh

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 5,736
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Why was naturalisation needed in early 1914?
« Reply #11 on: Tuesday 23 May 17 14:27 BST (UK) »
In the UK of 1914 the majority of the peeps never had the vote anyhow!

Skoosh.

Offline cando

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 22,332
    • View Profile
Re: Why was naturalisation needed in early 1914?
« Reply #12 on: Tuesday 23 May 17 23:07 BST (UK) »
In the UK of 1914 the majority of the peeps never had the vote anyhow!

Skoosh.

But they did in Australia ;)

The Commonwealth of Australia Franchise Act of 1902. The first Parliament granted the right to vote to men and women who were British subjects 21 years or older. This franchise applied to both houses of federal parliament and was free of property qualification.

Cheers
Cando
Census Information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk


Offline Skoosh

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 5,736
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Why was naturalisation needed in early 1914?
« Reply #13 on: Wednesday 24 May 17 09:22 BST (UK) »
Well ahead of so-called British democracy Cando, it took the mass carnage of the Great War to extend the franchise & even today there are 600 sitting in the House of Lords (at vast expense) who are completely unelected & making rules for the rest of us!

Citizen not Subject?

Skoosh.

Offline Johnf04

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 612
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Why was naturalisation needed in early 1914?
« Reply #14 on: Wednesday 24 May 17 09:49 BST (UK) »
I hate to brag, but in New Zealand, the property qualification was abolished in 1879, and the franchise extended to women in 1893.
Farrell  - Ayrshire
Cairns - Ayrshire
McCann - Ayrshire
Brown - Ayrshire
Petty - Yorkshire, Durham
Lucas - Staffordshire, Durham
Whitaker - Yorkshire
Thackrah - Yorkshire
Stephenson - Durham
Marshall - Yorkshire
Walker - Staffordshire, Southland New Zealand
McCullough -  Antrim, Southland New Zealand,
Cavanagh - Galway, Southland New Zealand
Anthony - Tipperary, Southland New Zealand
Bath - Cornwall, Tasmania, Southland
Brungot - Alesund, Norway; Southland
Bonthron - Fifeshire, Southland