Hi Matt,
Now this is interesting, or not! It rang a bell, can't remember why.
The marriage actually took place at Rochester (St Margaret) by Licence. The PR at Seasalter does state where, when and by whom!
The licence does not appear to be held at Canterbury so, maybe it was issued at Rochester as it was to take place outside the see of Canterbury. The Licence for Thomas Chambers' next marriage was issued at Canterbury. Martha buried 5 Feb 1744 at Seasalter. I don't know if any Rochester Licence details are online anywhere.
Maybe someone will know where and how to get details of Rochester Licences.
Tony
Now this is interesting, and puzzling. I have a record of Martha's burial and also a record of Thomas' second marriage. This second marriage took place in 1744 when he married Margaret Blackbourne of Whitstable. Again the marriage took place by licence and the entry reads as follows:
"Chambers, Thomas of Seasalter, widr. and Marg. Blackbourne of Whitstable, spr. At W. Norton or Lynstead. Aug 1, 1744"
What's puzzling is that Thomas appears to have had two sons with the same name, William.
Thomas and Martha had a son named William christened in Seasalter on 6 June 1742.
Thomas and
Margaret had a son name William christened in Seasalter on 29 October 1755.
William is my direct ancestor and married Farley Allen on 29 November 1768. They had a son named James born in Faversham in 1770, whose daughter Martha (born in Faversham in 1801) married Nathaniel Shrubsole Smith in Faversham in 1820.
The first William would be about 26 then. On the other hand the second William would only be 13 so he is unlikely to be my ancestor.
It could be that this Thomas is not my direct ancestor, but if that's the case then where was my William from? I'll look into this and see what I can find.
Matt