Hi Matt,
Here comes trouble, again.
I don't think 1747 is a possibility. Having looked at the child-bearing life of Elizabeth Beaney, her last confinement was in 1804, when her age would have been about 57!
Children as found
Anne 1784, Chartham
Thomas and John (both 1785) Chartham
William 1786, Chartham
Elizabeth 1788, Chilham
Mildred 1790, Chilham
Catherine, 1792, Chilham
John 1793, Chilham
Edmund (or Edward) 1796, Chilham
Thomas 1797, Chilham
Susannah 1799, Chilham
Robert 1802, Chilham
Thomas 1804, Chilham
There is a more feasible birth at Harbledown in 1764 however, this does not match the age as given at death.
Here are the baptism details, as found on Family Search,
1764 Mar 9 Elizabeth FARBRASS d/o William & Elizabeth
Sorry for giving you more to think about.
Tony
Hi Tony
That certainly confuses things a bit. I know that the Elizabeth Farbrass I've got born in Chartham in 1747 is the only one I've found myself. She has been in my files for a couple of years but I've only recently looked into it again as I'm having to redraw the Farbrass tree.
Mildred Beaney (1790) is my direct ancestor via her marriage to Henry Wiles in Chilham in 1810. She died in 1865.
I had thought it odd that she was having her last child at the age of 57 but in years of searching I haven't found any sign of any Elizabeth born in Chartham in about 1758.
The 1764 date would make more sense with the dates of the children and would certainly fit better with the marriage date. My only question here is how far is Harbledown from Chartham, are they close?
I've just had a look through file of original records [ie photocopies of entries in PRs etc] and I don't have a copy of John and Elizabeth's marriage which seems odd. I have a note in my files which states the marriage is recorded on Ancestry. I am sure the marriage entry stated that Elizabeth was 'of Chartham' but now I will have to go back and double check. As I said I haven't looked at the Farbrass line for a while and it's only because I'm redrawing the tree now that I'm taking another look lol!
Obviously if the Elizabeth Farbrass born in Harbledown is my Elizabeth then you're right that the burial of Elizabeth Beany in 1824 wouldn't fit. Do you know if there is another burial for an Elizabeth Beaney in Chilham that might fit better with the 1764 christening?
Anyhow I'll stop there as this gives me a few things to work on whilst I'm at the library tomorrow.
Many thanks for the thoughts and help with this. It's certainly given me something to think about.
Best Wishes
Matt