Author Topic: Richard Parnham  (Read 786 times)

Online rosie99

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 21,990
    • View Profile
Re: Richard Parnham
« Reply #9 on: Sunday 09 July 17 12:04 BST (UK) »
Right thank you  :D

Thank you Millie for asking  ;D
Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

RootsChat is the busiest, largest free family history forum site in the country. It is completely free to use. Register now.
Also register instantly with Facebook or Twitter (and other social networks). Start your genealogy search now.


Offline Milliepede

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 7,667
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Richard Parnham
« Reply #10 on: Sunday 09 July 17 12:06 BST (UK) »
When in doubt  ;D
Hinchliffe Huddersfield Wiltshire

RootsChat is the busiest, largest free family history forum site in the country. It is completely free to use. Register now.
Also register instantly with Facebook or Twitter (and other social networks). Start your genealogy search now.


Offline sarah

  • Administrator
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • ********
  • Posts: 15,896
  • RootsChat Co-Founder
    • View Profile
Re: Richard Parnham
« Reply #11 on: Monday 10 July 17 11:03 BST (UK) »
Posted on behalf of rosieM

Quote
Thank you Millipeed it was jane and george i was looking for. But iv connection to wilson. Did George wed Jane hooson? I think this might break it if i can find the mother of the eldest children. Thanks so much. Ps cant seem to find reply on rootschat on my phone
For Help on how to post an Image on RootsChat
http://www.rootschat.com/forum/index.php?topic=459330.0

If you have been helped on RootsChat be sure to spread the word!

UK Census info. Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline Milliepede

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 7,667
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Richard Parnham
« Reply #12 on: Monday 10 July 17 11:29 BST (UK) »
Can you confirm the parents details on the birth you have for Richard please?

My theory is the mother of Richard was Sarah Wilson (marriage 1852) then George married Jane Attrick (marriage 1866) but I could be wrong. 

It all hinges on what the birth says. 



Hinchliffe Huddersfield Wiltshire

Offline Milliepede

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 7,667
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Richard Parnham
« Reply #13 on: Monday 10 July 17 14:48 BST (UK) »
Can anyone find the birth for Alice c1852 Nottingham? 

Thomas in Jun 1860
William in Mar 1862
Worksop both have MMN Wilson

but there are 2 births in East Retford with MMN Hooson
George Henry Mar 1853
George Mar 1854

so certainly needs a bit of untangling  :-\







Hinchliffe Huddersfield Wiltshire

Online rosie99

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 21,990
    • View Profile
Re: Richard Parnham
« Reply #14 on: Monday 10 July 17 14:58 BST (UK) »
Is this what you are hoping for  :-\
June qtr 1851
Hatterick    Alice       
Nottingham    15   637

no mmn on GRO index
Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline Milliepede

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 7,667
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Richard Parnham
« Reply #15 on: Monday 10 July 17 15:02 BST (UK) »
It could be her, can't find any other contenders  :-\
Hinchliffe Huddersfield Wiltshire

Offline rosieM

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 43
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Richard Parnham
« Reply #16 on: Tuesday 11 July 17 21:15 BST (UK) »
It could be her, can't find any other contenders  :-\

It has ruled out it could help me. But its her I feel. Unwed mum Jane i think.  And regards Richard Parnham Im just waiting for the cert😐 think Id found it was Sarah and Thomas. But it will be here any day to make certain.
Since my post this week and with all of you helping,  and Carole, I have found births for all the Hatricks bar Jane (pre 1837) but it looks like im wrong abt her being any other than Hatrick now Iv done that. Least thats settled.
How her son came to be named Price  (proven by death record involving property etc) is the big mystery. I had even thought he may have had diff mother..but he uses JH.s  name for his middle name and gives it his daughter Graces middle name. A lady in Lincoln library made a point last wk that the Jane on the 1861 census may not be Jane Hatrick. Hence this search. Yet if not, the the Alice named along with my George may not be Alice Hatterick either. What a nightmare my ancestors are to track😵😢  he must be there somewhere. And until found nothing can move forward. Hes the father of both my  gt grandfathers (brothers). thank you all for your kind help ..
Price-notts/yorks/grimsby/louth/derbyshire
Cunningham-hull/louth/notts/grimsby
Hollis- notts/yorks
Wilson- yorks/notts/boston
Russell- market deeping lincs
Morris- bedfordshire
Mobbs/Moggs- lincoln/louth/grimsby
Smiths-  yorks/lincoln
Gray - yorks/derbyshire
Bramwell- chesterfield/derby/louth
Carrara - norwich
Drake - peterborough

Offline rosieM

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 43
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Richard Parnham
« Reply #17 on: Thursday 13 July 17 14:11 BST (UK) »
Excuse my ignorance but what is the BOB?

If rosieM could confirm details from the Worksop 1858 birth and why it is wrong maybe we can move forward on the right track :)

Hiya Millipede and any other helping hands ;)  Im pleased to say I was Wrong not the Cert. Have just got it for Richard Parnham, M; Jane Parnham MN Wilson.  Confirmation ;) :D  Im guessing also now that the certificate I already have for George Price (Parnham on Census 1861 but legally Price) b 1854 in Lincoln is the correct one.    F; George Price, M; Jane Price MN Wilson. Living in Lincoln then. I did come across another child, in 1848 & Mary Price b also in Lincoln 1856 , possibly died  but no other entry for that family in Lincoln after that.
One more thing, on Samuel A Parnham's birth Certificate, same address as Richard P.   M; Jane Parnham MN Attrick.  Is this one Lady? or Two different ones?  if I can get to the bottom of this,  I,  WE have cracked it !! ;D ;D
* Found wed Thomas Price & Jane Wilson Nottingham?     1847  Mar  15 756
*Can anyone find this Thomas on 1851 Census please?
* or George Price? maybe his middle name used later
 *Jane Wilson? b Doncaster   (same place as Jane Hatrick/Attrick?) I know where Jane H is 1851.
*George Parnham couldnt be found either 1851! Did the family simply switch name? Both Parnham and Price on Birth certs occ  'Chair Mender or Chair maker. ::) :o
Price-notts/yorks/grimsby/louth/derbyshire
Cunningham-hull/louth/notts/grimsby
Hollis- notts/yorks
Wilson- yorks/notts/boston
Russell- market deeping lincs
Morris- bedfordshire
Mobbs/Moggs- lincoln/louth/grimsby
Smiths-  yorks/lincoln
Gray - yorks/derbyshire
Bramwell- chesterfield/derby/louth
Carrara - norwich
Drake - peterborough