Author Topic: Possibly Mary Ann Schofield - date needed please  (Read 260 times)

Online sandrastocks54

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 412
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Possibly Mary Ann Schofield - date needed please
« on: Monday 22 January 18 17:53 GMT (UK) »
Please could somebody give me a possible date for this photo so we can determine whether it could be Mary Ann Schofield?

Many thanks
Sandra

RootsChat is the busiest, largest free family history forum site in the country. It is completely free to use. Register now.
Also register instantly with Facebook or Twitter (and other social networks). Start your genealogy search now.


Offline Treetotal

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 21,334
  • Who are you?
    • View Profile
Re: Possibly Mary Ann Schofield - date needed please
« Reply #1 on: Monday 22 January 18 22:35 GMT (UK) »
I would say it taken in the 1870s.
Carol
CAPES Hull. KIRK  Leeds, Hull. JONES  Wales,  Lancashire. CARROLL Ireland, Lancashire, U.S.A. BROUGHTON Leicester, Goole, Hull BORRILL  Lincolnshire, Durham, Hull. GROOM  Wishbech, Hull. ANTHONY St. John's Nfld. BUCKNALL Lincolnshire, Hull. BUTT Harbour Grace, Newfoundland. PARSONS  Western Bay, Newfoundland. MONAGHAN  Ireland, U.S.A. PERRY Cheshire, Liverpool.
 
RESTORERS:PLEASE DO NOT USE MY RESTORES WITHOUT PRIOR PERMISSION - THANK YOU

RootsChat is the busiest, largest free family history forum site in the country. It is completely free to use. Register now.
Also register instantly with Facebook or Twitter (and other social networks). Start your genealogy search now.


Online McGroger

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 976
  • Convicts, Commoners and Outlaws
    • View Profile
Re: Possibly Mary Ann Schofield - date needed please
« Reply #2 on: Tuesday 23 January 18 04:20 GMT (UK) »
Have a look at this one. (Right hand column, row 10.)
Said to be documented to 1877.
http://www.phototree.com/gallery.asp?cat=70s&f0=1870s
You’d almost swear the two women were sisters!
Peter
Convicts: COSIER (1791); LEADBEATER (1791); SINGLETON (& PARKINSON) (1792); STROUD (1793); BARNES (aka SYDNEY) (1800); DAVIS (1804); CLARK (1806); TYLER (1810); COWEN (1818); ADAMS[ON] (1821); SMITH (1827); WHYBURN (1827); HARBORNE (1828).
Commoners: DOUGAN (1844); FORD (1849); JOHNSTON (1850); BEATTIE (& LONG) (1856); BRICKLEY (1883).
Outlaws: MCGREGOR (1883) & ass. clans, Glasgow, Glenquaich, Glenalmond and Glengyle.

Online sandrastocks54

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 412
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Possibly Mary Ann Schofield - date needed please
« Reply #3 on: Tuesday 23 January 18 09:47 GMT (UK) »
Thank you both.  That's definitely the right timeframe to be Mary Ann.

Peter, you're right, the hairstyle is exactly the same!

Sandra